InArt - 1/6 Wonder Woman (BvS)

[HyperDrive]

Idk why y’all are obsessed with cloaks ppl want seamless body and also cloaks

In this case, yeah idk why one would want to pose her with the cloak for BvS. But hey, different strokes for different folks lol

 

[Redditeer28]

That’s completely different.

Of course it is. Lol

 

[sj2106]

You’re saying they could include other stuff from her other DCEU appearances, but we’re talking INART here. Correct me if I’m wrong, but when have they included accessories that aren’t from the specific branded film? Also, if they have done that, perhaps it’s out of stupidity?

Not InArt that I'm aware of.

I'd have been happy if HT had included the sword and shield with the WW84 figure even though she didn't use them in that movie.

 

[HyperDrive]

Not InArt that I'm aware of.

I'd have been happy if HT had included the sword and shield with the WW84 figure even though she didn't use them in that movie.

I mean, look yeah I guess collectors would take that, but if it doesn’t pertain to that specific license, idk why even ask or hope it’s included lol

 

[Redditeer28]

Idk why y’all are obsessed with cloaks ppl want seamless body and also cloaks

Options friend. And the good thing with her cloak is that there are slots for the arms. The seamless body could still be shown off with the cloak if someone wanted.

 

[HyperDrive]

For those who want the cloak, ask Topo to make a run lol

@Redditeer28

 

[Omega9300]

I mean I want to be excited. But this is just a pic of an official photo of Gal Gadot, cut and pasted onto a picture of a base. They literally just cut the head of one pic, and posted it on another, then cut the hands off entirely for some reason.

View attachment 750037


View attachment 750036

View attachment 750035

I hear you Rory, and if there was nothing more to go on I would be underwhelmed also.

But this “development” does make me more confident that they are going to do a BvS Wonder Woman.

Also, look what they did with the Paul Atreides sculpt most recently, it looks so much like him. I believe InArt is going to give collectors a next level Gal Gadot likeness that will surpass even the Hot Toys WB 100 Wonder Woman.

I know there have been some QC issues with InArt forum members have had to deal with (personally I haven’t experienced any issues), but I guess at this point I just trust InArt to produce better detailed, less toy-like 1/6 scale figures. I say this as a person who loves Hot Toys figures.

 

[sj2106]

I mean, look yeah I guess collectors would take that, but if it doesn’t pertain to that specific license, idk why even ask or hope it’s included lol

To be honest I wouldn't use the cloak either. Wouldn't want to cover the armour and seamless body but if they do include it, the god killer sword or something else not from BvS I wouldn't complain.

 

[HyperDrive]

To be honest I wouldn't use the cloak either. Wouldn't want to cover the armour and seamless body but if they do include it, the god killer sword or something else not from BvS I wouldn't complain.

I guess I just don’t set myself up for disappointment cause I only expect what’s related to the specific license or look. It also wouldn’t be accurate to BvS WW. But hey, to each one’s own. Everyone collects the way they choose!

 

[Redditeer28]

To be honest I wouldn't use the cloak either. Wouldn't want to cover the armour and seamless body but if they do include it, the god killer sword or something else not from BvS I wouldn't complain.

I think the god killer sword would be harder to justify because you can't really make it out in BvS but the cloak is there clear as day so if their license only covers BvS then they could absolutely make it if they wanted to.

 

[The Buffinator]

This is a figure to represent the movie. The photo is of her in the movie. I'm just saying that I'd like to get something we see her wear in the movie as an accessory for the figure from this movie. It's nothing for you to panic about.

No one is panicking. It’s just not necessary. Like I said, good luck

If you guys are going to argue about whether or not a cloak belongs with a BvS figure, might as well throw down over the inclusion of the brighter armor as well. As I recall she only wore the darker armor in BvS. Kind of hard to tell how shiny it was in that black & white photo but what the hell, I say have at it.

 

[Chopper Face]

Queen studios are putting out a Fellowship of the Ring Aragorn wearing his red undershirt, which he doesn’t acquire until The Two Towers. Screw the rules!
Let Viper be the brazen, law breaking badass he was born to be.

 

[HyperDrive]

If you guys are going to argue about whether or not a cloak belongs with a BvS figure, might as well throw down over the inclusion of the brighter armor as well. As I recall she only wore the darker armor in BvS. Kind of hard to tell how shiny it was in that black & white photo but what the hell, I say have at it.

She only had darker, muted armor, correct. Like others have said, I think they just spread out her armor pieces to indicate what she comes with. But Idk, I won’t really comment on that given the grainy as hell picture.

 

[sj2106]

I guess I just don’t set myself up for disappointment cause I only expect what’s related to the specific license or look. It also wouldn’t be accurate to BvS WW. But hey, to each one’s own. Everyone collects the way they choose!

Oh I wouldn't expect any extra pieces or complain if they aren't included.

99% of the time I'm just gonna have her standing there holding the sword and shield. I haven't even changed Superman's hands yet let alone have him using the accessories.

 

[xb24]

Is she going to be made of silicone like JND?