InArt - The Batman 1/6th Figure

[choombaz]

Maybe HT made future Pattison -- wider, heavier, older.

Howie got access to the The Batman Part II (2026)

 

[The Buffinator]

Maybe HT made future Pattison -- wider, heavier, older.

Or the Pattinson after prolonged steroid use. Just like Barry Bonds, his noggin got quite large lol...

 

[Wor-Gar]

Just like Barry Bonds, his noggin got quite large lol...

 

[HyperDrive]

I agree the likeness is not 100% on the INART cowled sculpt, but imo, it’s still overall better between the two.

I know there’s one more person I’ve seen that also thinks the same thing, but are we really the only ones who thinks the eyes are really widely spaced on the HT cowl? If you were to remove the cowl, the eyes would be anatomically off. That alone kills it for me in any comparison discussion.



Also, the side profile on the INART is considerably more accurate than the Hot Toys version where it’s more “squished in” for lack of a better word.

 

[potatocorner4life]

I agree the likeness is not 100% on the INART cowled sculpt, but imo, it’s still overall better between the two.

I know there’s one more person I’ve seen that also thinks the same thing, but are we really the only ones who thinks the eyes are really widely spaced on the HT cowl? If you were to remove the cowl, the eyes would be anatomically off. That alone kills it for me in any comparison discussion.

View attachment 699022

Also, the side profile on the INART is considerably more accurate than the Hot Toys version where it’s more “squished in” for lack of a better word.

What I don’t understand is how their bruce Wayne’s eyes look fine but then the HT has a different set of proportions. Doesn’t make sense. They could have used the same measurements.

 

[HyperDrive]

like, I’m sorry but this kills it.. lol. His eyes are Sid the Sloth-esque. INART’s is better proportioned and the anatomy is intact. I would’ve added it to the picture, I just haven’t found a good straight on headshot with the eyes looking up yet.

 

[chrisstbh]

From Jedha Patrol review...


View attachment 698969

View attachment 698970


View attachment 698971

Hot Toys looks like a decent custom.

 

[The Buffinator]

I agree the likeness is not 100% on the INART cowled sculpt, but imo, it’s still overall better between the two.

I know there’s one more person I’ve seen that also thinks the same thing, but are we really the only ones who thinks the eyes are really widely spaced on the HT cowl? If you were to remove the cowl, the eyes would be anatomically off. That alone kills it for me in any comparison discussion.

View attachment 699023

like, I’m sorry but this kills it.. lol. His eyes are Sid the Sloth-esque. INART’s is better proportioned and the anatomy is intact. I would’ve added it to the picture, I just haven’t found a good straight on headshot with the eyes looking up yet.

?????? Whatever you're smoking, you need to share! I think your imagination has gotten the better of you.

All kidding aside, I think we're pretty much all in agreement that that the InArt cowl & head comes out on top, so we don't need to start seeing stuff that isn't there. If you compare the above to the photo of Pattinson that Wor-Gar posted on the previous page, the eye positions relative to the edges of his mouth seem pretty spot on. They may be fractionally wider but not way off like you're suggesting.

 

[Wor-Gar]

 

[The Buffinator]

Thanks for reposting - it will make it easier for @HyperDrive to make the comparison.

 

[Gwynbliedd]

I still can’t help but feel that inarts jaw is off severely. Granted, both of the jaws aren’t great but inarts overall is incredible

 

[Chopper Face]

Pretty much the one detail that stood out to me in Jedha’s comparison video as a win for HT was the missing kneepad fastener clasp thing on InArts figure since they look to have gone with a working Velcro piece instead.

So now I need to know which is more accurate and if the IA has more detail around the back.

 

[Wor-Gar]

InArt's strap look very cheap there.

Did you AI that photo?

 

[i_amjam]

I’m interested to see a comparison of the sculpted hair Inart figure to Hot Toys. That version and the non deluxe Hot Toys version are much closer in price once you add in the tax and shipping cost from Sideshow.

 

[webhead05]

I’m interested to see a comparison of the sculpted hair Inart figure to Hot Toys. That version and the non deluxe Hot Toys version are much closer in price once you add in the tax and shipping cost from Sideshow.

Agreed. From the few shots I've seen, InArt's sculpted hair looks more detailed than HT, but there just haven't been a ton of looks at it. Where's the love for us peasants?

 

[Wor-Gar]

 

[Chopper Face]

InArt's strap look very cheap there.

Did you AI that photo?

What sort of beast do you take me for?
I would never artificially inseminate a digital image.

 

[TonyD15]

The biggest issue for me at least, as I'll be owning both, can stick the Hot Toys one inside Jazz Inc Batmobile, is that Hot Toys figures could be so much better if they just gave better bodies to their figures, the clothes always look oversized and stuffed rather than specially tailored to the models look. It reminds me of all the Captain America's, Thor, Superman, ect.

I ordered from Spec Fiction, I'll have it sometime in 2025. Missed out from Kit unfortunately. Looks great, some inaccuracies but it won't upset me at all.

 

[xb24]

A bit worried about the cowl material. How did the tip snap off?

 

[Luisenigma1]

Definitely I'm amazed how well this figure posed compared to HT. In Jedha's video you can see how well it moves and the fact the suit is tailored specifically to the body. Issue with HT is that they use their ttm18 or ttm21 style bodies slightly modified but put padded fatsuits.