- Joined
- Sep 25, 2006
- Messages
- 5,044
- Reaction score
- 3,903
@Spiln3r not in term of the realism. Because the figure really looks like a real human being.
I think what bothers me the most is that Inart created an idealized Gandalf.
Honestly, I think you have it reversed where Asmus’ version is idealized. When i look at Asmus’ PROTO, everything looks symmetrical. Like...he’s “handsome” (in an old wizard kind of way). InArt’s version seems to have captured the asymmetry of Ian’s face as well as “imperfections”. That’s why I literally gasped when I laid eyes on IA’s proto, I couldn’t believe how life like it looked.
Bare with me, this is gonna be long:
Now looks at Asmus’ proto:
Not one of these proto pics looks ANYTHING like the stills from the movie...but why do we “see” Gandalf/Ian?
Because Asmus captured the essence of him and made him look “handsome” and “cool”.
THAT’S what we were sold on.
Now we have IA’s version, that ISN’T idealized and actually looks like the images on top.
So...we need to ask ourselves here, are we judging these figures based off of what we see in our memory?
IA’s proto is clearly more accurate and less idealized, which is what I’ve always wanted in a portrait. one of the annoying things I have tolerated with HT sculpts is the constant idealizing of the actors faces. I don’t want the sculptors interpretation of the character, give me what I see on screen.
Last edited: