LOL. I know the director on this one has a real good track record. Just give me a competent movie. I don't need the 'BEST MOVIE OF THE DECADE' type level experience.That’s happening behind the scenes.
LOL. I know the director on this one has a real good track record. Just give me a competent movie. I don't need the 'BEST MOVIE OF THE DECADE' type level experience.That’s happening behind the scenes.
I don't know, I'm with @Wor-Gar on this one in the sense that ... maybe that will never happen again. Individually we're all older and in the collective sense ... there's so much more content out now than ever before, a glut of stories and entertainment with things like visual effects peaking ... absolutely, there are stand-out series and films I really, really enjoy for different reasons ... The Batman, Andor, Slow Horses ... all recent releases that come to mind immediately.I don't need the 'BEST MOVIE OF THE DECADE' type level experience.
Agree but I think Top Gun Maverick did a fine job of pulling lots of people in who had stopped going to movies.I don't know, I'm with @Wor-Gar on this one in the sense that ... maybe that will never happen again. Individually we're all older and in the collective sense ... there's so much more content out now than ever before, a glut of stories and entertainment with things like visual effects peaking ... absolutely, there are stand-out series and films I really, really enjoy for different reasons ... The Batman, Andor, Slow Horses ... all recent releases that come to mind immediately.
There are shows like most of Game of Thrones and Breaking Bad that captivated a huge general audience (I think) ... but 'event' films that people talk about for years and go see ten times? That may be a bygone era at this point.
It feels like the last 'big thing' was Iron Man-to-Endgame and even that didn't seem to pull in everyone the way something like Star Wars or even Jaws or Batman '89 did. It's hard to get perspective on something like this.
I wish they left Indy alone after Last Crusade, but Hollywood is gonna Hollywood and milk the cow on every franchise they can.LOL. I know the director on this one has a real good track record. Just give me a competent movie. I don't need the 'BEST MOVIE OF THE DECADE' type level experience.
That's my fear too. Indy is an extremely important series for me personally, and the rumors I've heard are so appalling that I can't bring myself to see it (or the trailer) until I find out for certain that they are not true. (Mangold has denied them on Twitter... as if he could be trusted any more than Abrams or Smith when it comes to lying about a movie or show.)The spectre of Kathleen Kennedy looms over it as well who seems to have the ability to poision any potentially good movie.
I'll give this a chance though and hope for the best, but can it really be Indy with Lucas and Spielberg?
TOD is already of lesser quality when compared to Raiders and TLC is already of lesser quality when compared to Raiders and TOD and KOTCS is already of lesser quality when compared to Raiders, TOD and TLC…..I wish they left Indy alone after Last Crusade, but Hollywood is gonna Hollywood and milk the cow on every franchise they can.
James Mangold has made some excellent movies, and the writers have a mixed record, but did write 'Ford v Ferarri' and 'Edge of Tomorrow ', so I'm optimistic for something at least good. The problem is with it being Indy, they shouldn't bring him back for anything other than excellent (like Top Gun Maverick), otherwise we're all going to wonder what was the point e.g. Crystal Skulls.
The spectre of Kathleen Kennedy looms over it as well who seems to have the ability to poision any potentially good movie.
I'll give this a chance though and hope for the best, but can it really be Indy with Lucas and Spielberg?
True, thats cause TLJ took such a heaping dump on the OT characters, incapable of telling anything actually new, or any story and character development, so they convinced themselves betraying ie; subverting who the classic characters were, was "great" story telling.The disdain here reminds me of the SW fanbase after TLJ came out, something it's still reeling from and only just now gaining momentum back with Andor.
I know if I am going to a $6 matinee I am going to encounter this unless I hit the first one in the morning and teenagers aren't awake yet. My other option is a $17 ticket at a cinema grill where you get fewer annoying people due to the higher price, but even then while watching Violent Night there was a lady in the row in front of me that had her bare feet reclined up which was disgusting. Would you take off your shoes in a restaurant? Well, yeah she probably would.For me personally the cinema experience has become much less attractive due to a new generation of movie goers, who lack all kinds of manners and don't respect the phones-off rule.
I think TLC is a bit better than TOD, so I don't think Indy always had a downward spiral. IMDb has RotLA at 8.4/10, TLC at 8.2/10 and TOD at 7.5/10. I think it's universally acknowledged that TOD is the weakest of the trilogy.TOD is already of lesser quality when compared to Raiders and TLC is already of lesser quality when compared to Raiders and TOD and KOTCS is already of lesser quality when compared to Raiders, TOD and TLC…..
Will Indy 5 break that downward trend?
I think so.
It certainly won’t be as good as Raiders that’s a given.
And being as good as TLC or TOD is not something to be proud of either now is it especially TLC lol
TLJ was garbage and deserved the disdain and backlash it received. It was a selfish film made by a selfish (although sometimes excellent) filmaker.The disdain here reminds me of the SW fanbase after TLJ came out, something it's still reeling from and only just now gaining momentum back with Andor.
IMDb has RotLA at 8.4/10, TLC at 8.2/10 and TOD at 7.5/10.
/\THIS/\Right there, IMDB has it wrong. Raiders is only 8.4? And only slightly better than LC? Seriously?
Raiders is a near perfect adventure movie. Deserves a 9+ at the very least. I mean, if not Raiders, than what the hell is?
ToD is a far cry from Raiders, true. But I think LC is even further. Suddenly Indy is a family film and the movie is full of inconsistencies, really poor logic, and silly gags. Connery makes the movie... but a jokey buddy-buddy is not the best structure for Indiana Jones. It reminded me of a Roger Moore James Bond movie in its slapstick humor after years of good Connery ones.
For me, each film got progressively worse.
Only seven movies have an IMDb score of 9 or more. Like it or not, but 964k people have rated it to give it a score of 8.4/10 and a rank of #55.Right there, IMDB has it wrong. Raiders is only 8.4? And only slightly better than LC? Seriously?
Raiders is a near perfect adventure movie. Deserves a 9+ at the very least. I mean, if not Raiders, than what the hell is?
ToD is a far cry from Raiders, true. But I think LC is even further. Suddenly Indy is a family film and the movie is full of inconsistencies, really poor logic, and silly gags. Connery makes the movie... but a jokey buddy-buddy is not the best structure for Indiana Jones. It reminded me of a Roger Moore James Bond movie in its slapstick humor after years of good Connery ones.
For me, each film got progressively worse.
I can’t agree with this sorry, I’ve studied film most of my life and I can say objectively (lol) that Raiders is one of the best directed films of the modern age. I can provide evidence in the form of pages and pages and pages of my notes why Raiders is one of the greats.We're all entitled to our opinions, but the rating of a movie on IMDb is a better reflection of a movie's objective quality than our own biased opinions - it's only wrong in your subjective opinion.
Enter your email address to join: