jye4ever
Broke and happy
Poor a-dev that must hurt to read lol
What I think your referring to is the comedy element being to full on for TLC. While ROTLA had its funny bits (especially Indy getting hit with the mirror LOL) it’s tone was mostly serious, except on occasion when Indy was not living up to the Hero role....it was funny to watch the hero in a non heroic moment.Even though TOD has major issues (and likely doesn't play well with a certain element of society today) it still at times has an Raiders-Indy edge but something major changed with TLC.
The tone was off and Connery was kind of wasted as this pompous, bumbling buffoon for a lot of it - as was Brody, Sallah and even Indy at times. Just so over the top and even stupid in many places, and many moments where you're aware of actors on a set.
The Raiders darker realism had just evaporated, replaced by this goofy, not-as-funny-as it-thinks tone that I recall feeling so jarred by when I saw it at the Manns Chinese in 1989. The entire River Phoenix opening was so cartoonish - too Goonies, not enough Stand By Me like it needed to be.
That being said, it's still watchable unlike KOTCS, and do have TLC collectables.
TOD was straight out Adventure as there are hardly any scenes at all that I think are funny
Yeah those might be a good list for all the things I hated about it.You may not think its funny, but ToD is loaded with comedy. Too much so -- tons of slapstick with Willie (getting on elephant the wrong way or falling off her bed, screaming and running from jungle animals scene, etc), almost anything with Short Round, the gross-out banquette scene. It gets pretty dark once inside the catacombs but even then there's the Chief dropping the rock on his head or Short Round's fast-motion karate-chops.
It all has a silliness quotient to it...
To me , Connery as Jones Sr did more with his role that those 2 combined.
Raiders has the same balance of comedy as most adventures - maybe 80% serious, 20% comedic or more light-hearted.What I think your referring to is the comedy element being to full on for TLC. While ROTLA had its funny bits (especially Indy getting hit with the mirror LOL) it’s tone was mostly serious, except on occasion when Indy was not living up to the Hero role....it was funny to watch the hero in a non heroic moment.
TLC had too many of those moments, for some. I think it’s a great film, and I view it as Comedy/Adventure.....while ROTLA is Adventure with splashes of comedy.
TOD was straight out Adventure as there are hardly any scenes at all that I think are funny...(ok maybe Indy screaming “We are going to DIE” .... but with terrible special effects(even for the time) a silly cult story, and possible the most annoying female lead ever on screen ....I find it almost unwatchable......almost.
TLC was the first Indy movie that to me also really didn't feel like I was actually watching a real period and place. TLC feels bogus from the silly River Phoenix get-go (who the hell cast that Scooby-Doo line-up of opening sequence dolts? And gotta love a red-faced fat kid) all the way to the silly "step of Faith" ending.
My 1999 self, standing stunned outside Mann Chinese on TPM opening night, wants to step through time and slap you and your objective truth.See this is where I feel like Ducky when he reads PT hate or the ROTJ criticism in the SWIX thread the past few days. What films were you all watching, you're all wrong, why can't you just enjoy them like I do. I just understand that everything that has happened before will happen again and has always happened. If you guys do not hold objective truth then neither do I and nor will the people after me. Like what you like, don't like what you don't like, talk about it if you want, continue talking about it 20-40 years after the fact if you're inclined - if it's still something that's in the public consciousness and there's a medium through which to do it there's nothing surprising about someone doing so.
TLC > Raiders!!!
Damn that’s a pretty epic post.Raiders has the same balance of comedy as most adventures - maybe 80% serious, 20% comedic or more light-hearted.
TLC almost seems to reverse that, where it becomes hard to take what's happening onscreen seriously. Compare the ROTLA truck chase with the "Daaad!!" TLC sidecar chase.
And while some of TOD's FX were bad (Jaws cave...,) TLC is just chock full of scenes that 100% feel like a studio set with a bunch of costumed actors on it. That castle sequence is pretty bad in all regards, right down to the Looney Toons coils of rope around the Joneses in the chairs.
TLC was the first Indy movie that to me also really didn't feel like I was actually watching a real period and place: TOD has its Velveeta throughout, but many sections do feel like you are in 1930s India etc. Raiders obviously excels in this regard - transporting you to a time and place. TLC feels bogus from the silly River Phoenix get-go (who the hell cast that Scooby-Doo line-up of opening sequence dolts? And gotta love a red-faced fat kid) all the way to the silly "step of Faith" ending.
But oh, poor Brody - from edgy friend who warns Indy in ROTLA what he's getting into to the sweaty early alzheimers comedy of TLC. And where the hell was Connery getting in some kickass Bond moments in the second half alongside his son - this was nearly a decade before The Rock. Instead he's this total ninny who whines and acts like a stupid grandpa, not the architect of the whole grail quest they are on.
Just as ROTJ was setting the stage for the off-the-cliff trajectory of the PT, you can clearly see in TLC the seeds of KOTCS and perhaps... Indy 5.
Truer words have never been spokenIn a two-week period in 1989, two of my most favorite franchises hit an iceberg (Ghostbusters II was two weeks after TLC) and then months later, BTTF2 sunk yet another one.
From there it was like the St Valentine's Day Massacre: Gremlins 2, Predator 2, Robocop 2, (not a fan of Die Hard 2 either)...
Something changed in that latter 80s/early 90s period.
Enter your email address to join: