- Joined
- Oct 14, 2016
- Messages
- 5,442
- Reaction score
- 5,476
But the director of Hook isn’t directing it, the director of Kate and Leopold is lol!!Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Directed by Steven Spielberg
****
But the director of Hook isn’t directing it, the director of Kate and Leopold is lol!!Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
Directed by Steven Spielberg
****
Have them gynoids riding mecha T-rexes and I would've already rewatched it 10 times by now instead of the 1If BR2049 had naked gynoids, an amazing spinner chase, a strong villain with an army of robots, and a tough, resourceful hero with a take charge attitude... it would have made billions.
Great post. I would kill to be as fit as Ford at eighty. I will say, I did some quick research and this may be the oldest actor to be the lead in an action film in the modern era. Connery was younger when he stopped and Stallone, Schwarzenegger are 5+ years younger.
Don't get how some are still grappling and kvetching about his age, or that it's some huge impasse for some, he's a frikin old guy playing an old guy, no $%!#! What's not to get? Either by desire or necessity driven to adventure once again, whose miles and years have caught up with him, what's the problem?
Don't get the complaints. that is the character through and through, why would he stop.
Of all the the things wrong with Crystal Skull his age wasn't one of them, and it's not here either. It's a legit part of the character.
WTF do people want? For frikin Muts to take over? For a recast? I certainly don't.
I loved Mangold's Old Man Xavier and Logan, Loved Hopkins as old Man Zorro (Speilberg/Amblin prod.) who inspired the movie serials before that, and Old Man Jones fits right in.
If the story and direction suck however that's something else.
I agree, 110 year old Indy in 30 years must happen
I really don't get the anxiety and kvetching about his age, or that it's some huge impasse for some, he's a frikin old guy playing an old guy, no $%!#! What's not to get? Either by desire or necessity driven to adventure once again, whose miles and now the years have fianly caught up with him, what's the problem? That's a great thing to explore.
Don't get the complaints. that is the character through and through, why would he stop.
Of all the the things wrong with Crystal Skull his age wasn't one of them, and it's not here either. It's a legit part of the character.
WTF do people want? For frikin Muts to take over? For a recast? I certainly don't.
I loved Mangold's Old Man Xavier and Logan, Loved Hopkins as old Man Zorro (Speilberg/Amblin prod.) who inspired the movie serials before that, and Old Man Jones fits right in.
If the story and direction suck however that's something else.
Plus he needs to be playing the saxophone lolI think he should have lost an eye in Crystal Skull so he'd match Old Indy from the Young Indy TV show.
I never finished that movie, though it had more to do with not wanting to see Eastwood, arguably one of the last, if not the last of his generation, look feeble and... old.Anyone that's waving the "old age is okay" flag needs to watch Cry Macho. I grew up loving Clint Eastwood, but mother of god, that thing was an embarrassment. He's beating up men in their 20's and 30's, having relations with a woman half his age - it's just cringe inducing.
Even though they're fit for their age, doesn't mean people want to watch old men acting like young men. The Irishman, gees - another embarrassment. No doubt all amazing actors, but old men should act like old men; maybe take up the mentor mantle, not the action hero.
But as I always say - each to their own - if this sort of thing spins your noodle, good luck to you.
(Now, where was that hammer...)
the years have fianly caught up with him, what's the problem? That's a great thing to explore.
Don't get the complaints. that is the character through and through, why would he stop.
Yep Cry Macho was painful to watch. The Marksman with Liam Neeson was almost the exact same movie but so much more respectable.Anyone that's waving the "old age is okay" flag needs to watch Cry Macho. I grew up loving Clint Eastwood, but mother of god, that thing was an embarrassment. He's beating up men in their 20's and 30's, having relations with a woman half his age - it's just cringe inducing.
Even though they're fit for their age, doesn't mean people want to watch old men acting like young men. The Irishman, gees - another embarrassment. No doubt all amazing actors, but old men should act like old men; maybe take up the mentor mantle, not the action hero.
But as I always say - each to their own - if this sort of thing spins your noodle, good luck to you.
(Now, where was that hammer...)
I really don't get the anxiety and kvetching about his age, or that it's some huge impasse for some, he's a frikin old guy playing an old guy, no $%!#! What's not to get? Either by desire or necessity driven to adventure once again, whose miles and now the years have fianly caught up with him, what's the problem? That's a great thing to explore.
Don't get the complaints. that is the character through and through, why would he stop.
Indiana Jones is about adventure.
If this was some other kind of franchise, the dynamic would be different.
When Stallone entered the Creed film series, he didn't try to keep fighting as Rocky. There just comes a point where it makes no more sense. Also Harrison Ford is a movie star for a previous generation. While Shia LaBeouf was the wrong choice, the idea of passing the torch isn't a horrible idea.
Look at DeNiro in The Irishman. It's just bizarre and borderline mind boggling that anyone could believe DeNiro could pass for 40-50 years younger even with modern day technology.
But I felt the same with Guy Pearce and Prometheus. Just get an older actor for the later timeline scenes.
Why not pass it on to Leo DiCaprio to rebuild the franchise. Plenty of established star power there. Or Chris Pine, Chris Pratt or any number of young actors with some action movie pedigree.
If you pick a new actor, you open up the story possibilities. You can rebuild the origin story. You've got options
You keep Harrison Ford and you are stuck in a specific timeline and stuck with all kinds of physical limitations and you are stuck with what all the other movies did before.
If it was a different actor, I'd say it's a toss up to replace them. But this is Harrison Ford. Who has mailed it in for the last 15 years. Put it this way, Ford has done himself zero favors in helping himself to get choice and coveted roles.
Exactly, to the last. That is the character.Indiana Jones is about adventure.
Yep, If they were denying his age pretending he wasn't old, I'd get the complaints.whatever your greatest liability, you should fly straight towards that. If you try to pretend it's not there, you end up getting slings and arrows the whole way."
As for the character being young in perpetuity, If they do inevitably reboot / recast Indian Jones like they do with Bond, Batman, Spider-Man, frikin everything. Or worse spun-off as whatever derivative crap formula teen, race and/or gender swapped version you want the uncreative brain trust currently at Disney to pull out of their @$$ and claim "Look it's NEW! and Original!"Ford is a movie star for a previous generation. While Shia LaBeouf was the wrong choice, the idea of passing the torch isn't a horrible idea.
Why not pass it on to Leo DiCaprio to rebuild the franchise. Plenty of established star power there. Or Chris Pine, Chris Pratt or any number of young actors with some action movie pedigree.
If you pick a new actor, you open up the story possibilities. You can rebuild the origin story. You've got options
Enter your email address to join: