Don't say you can't compare the two, that comparison is accurate. I guess, to understand, you'd really have to know the difference between a Ranger (what I always considered Flint with his black beret) and a Green Beret. That alone is a dividing factor. Because both came with berets and a shotgun, doesn't mean anything. When you take into consideration that myself and Evilface will be swapping out Flint's Tigerstripe pants for something more accurate, the gap between the two grows.
There must be a misunderstanding on the basis for our comparisons.
You're exactly right 'Nam that there are many defining differences between a Ranger and a Green Beret, the biggest of which I believe (and correct me if I'm wrong) are that Green Berets are tasked to go in the most hostile environments, “go native”, win the hearts and minds of the locals, and train them and turn them against whatever despotic / authoritarian regime that is subjugating them. So from a military specialty POV, Flint and Falcon are very different (although his file card says Flint attended Special Forces school, too).
However, take what I said at face value. To me Flint and Flacon are too similar, design-wise. Yes, they have different unis and different equipment, but to me, the defining characteric(s) of both Flint and Falcon are that they both wore berets and carried shotguns.
When I think back to all the old RAH figures, every figure I owned had a defining characteristic(s) that is the first thing that comes to mind. Snake Eyes: black outfit, Uzi, and sword; Beachhead: balaclava; Low Light: knit cap, sniper rifle, red goggles / glasses. When I think of both Flint and Falcon, I think of a beret and a shotgun.
I’d love a Falcon figure (the RAH figure came with some cool gear, from his awesome radio backpack to his survival knife…although I never understood why he came with a shotgun. A weapon with longer range would have been better suited for him), but I’d like to see some diversity in design first.