The more I hear about this movie, the more I think WB might have blocked off any merchandising rights to it. It sounds incredibly violent and unnerving, more so than any big studio movie in the last few years, so I can understand their trepidation. I got the TOP kit and it's pretty great, I know they're making a second one in makeup/red suit, so it's not all bad.
- Quoting this to talk about that viewpoint that's out there, not @KevinGarveyJr. Although I'm not going to reference any specific plot point,
SPOILERS if you really want to hear nothing before you watch it for yourself -
As with sooo many things currently, this film has been a victim of the wildly hyperbole that being online seems to have given us, culturally. We saw an extreme positive reaction to it at the initial screening, then there's been an equally extreme overreaction/backlash to it (especially regarding how violent it is). Now there's a backlash against the backlash that returns to putting the film on a pedestal. No doubt it will go on
Saw it last night, FWIW I thought it was an interesting enough attempt to do something a bit different within the blockbuster/superhero context, but it falls short of succeeding to the extent which the various films its plainly referencing did.
Superb central performance that shows a fully-realised pitiful (rather than sympathetic) character, good production design, and excellent editing elevated otherwise
very on-the-nose and predictable screenwriting and direction.
A solidly average, tho well-made, film which could have been a great deal better, had there been more complexity and nuance in the writing and direction - but which will prove memorable and be rightly praised for an excellent lead performance.
Regarding the violence: acts of violence are concentrated, sporadic, and happen in a way which is fairly "real", and shows that all violence has consequences. I would say that's the opposite of "irresponsible" - you see that if people fire guns, people will die. You see that if people use knives, people will die. You see that if people seriously physically attack people, they will get severely hurt. Etc.
For all that I feel there's a real lack of subtlety in the
story, when it comes to the violence the
film certainly doesn't glorify it, when it happens. It is very matter of fact, and obviously - like in real life - unpleasant and extreme in that moment. It's equally not gory, lingering, or mindless. It's not your typical mainstream movie/TV violence.
I didn't find it unnerving either - in fact by the end I was actually a bit bored, but that's as a result of what I felt was some very predictable story and plotting, that really undid the much more interesting first half of the film. Fleck/Joker is an uncomfortable watch however - which is fine. He remains an arresting character from start to finish, even once I began to lose interest in the film as a whole, I never found the character dull or uninteresting.
He is not an anti-hero, he certainly hasn't been played as such; in my view Phoenix does a superb job of
always showing him as pitiful and dislikable, and while we see Fleck's motivations, that's not the same as empathising with them. Anyone who did might want to take a look at themselves to be perfectly honest, because if there's one thing both actor and film are
not trying to do, it's make Joker a character to whom audiences should
warm.
That's my thoughts anyway, not that anyone asked
For the TLDR crowd: If watching Joker encourages people to now go and watch the excellent King Of Comedy, which it quite deliberately references (which is not a criticism), that's a definite plus.
Oh yeah, something about 1/6 toys. Sorry, got carried away and forgot about that