Life, the Universe and Everything...

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Juan Valdez. He was bored.



Betty Crocker. Last ditch attempt to save her marriage.



Yes his name was Ug and continued to get a laugh everytime he said he ate Beaver and liked, never was able to continue past that and so he said screw it you guys get five.



Emo Cuttersmith was the first to try a tomato in a failed suicide after telling his friend Heinz, he was killed and the rest is history. The reason Tomatoes aren't in the wild anymore is because Birds are ^^^^^^^s and taking them all selling them to the Heinz Corporation.



Eli Postit was the first, he needed to take a message from a traveller who was passing through but missed his roommate. He did it with his hands and while he wasn't burned at the stake ironically gave the authorities a way to jot down who they wanted to burn a lot easier.



Blame the English.



I believe when assigning blame at SSC we are told by Dusty to just Blame Chris. Whether he had anything to do with it or not this is what is given to us via SSC themselves.



Yes you are too curious.

I think someone just broke my record.
 
If you're gonna do it, then do it right. :lol

I also think I killed the thread. :monkey2
 
Juan Valdez. He was bored.



Betty Crocker. Last ditch attempt to save her marriage.



Yes his name was Ug and continued to get a laugh everytime he said he ate Beaver and liked it, never was able to continue past that and so he said screw it you guys get five.



Emo Cuttersmith was the first to try a tomato in a failed suicide after telling his friend Heinz, he was killed and the rest is history. The reason Tomatoes aren't in the wild anymore is because Birds are ^^^^^^^s and taking them all selling them to the Heinz Corporation.



Eli Postit was the first, he needed to take a message from a traveller who was passing through but missed his roommate. He did it with his hands and while he wasn't burned at the stake ironically gave the authorities a way to jot down who they wanted to burn a lot easier.



Blame the English.



I believe when assigning blame at SSC we are told by Dusty to just Blame Chris. Whether he had anything to do with it or not this is what is given to us via SSC themselves.



Yes you are too curious.


Thank You!!! :bow :bow :bow

I can sleep tonight... until new questions spring into my head!!! :D

...and yes, it is Chris' fault!!!! :monkey3 :rotfl
 
I have a question--

Try to explain the concept of infinity (infinite time, infinite universe, and subsequently that there is an infinite amount of stars and planets filling the universe)

Really, that's crazy.
 
Thank You!!! :bow :bow :bow

I can sleep tonight... until new questions spring into my head!!! :D

...and yes, it is Chris' fault!!!! :monkey3 :rotfl

When those questions come you know where I am. :cool:

I have a question--

Try to explain the concept of infinity (infinite time, infinite universe, and subsequently that there is an infinite amount of stars and planets filling the universe)

Really, that's crazy.

There isn't an infinity complex, no time, universe etc. You see the same way that the time return on itself ie: there was a 7 PM today, there was one yesterday, there will be one tomorrow. The stars are just on a revolution the same way, same with the planets...Its like everything is on a loop.

Nuff said.
 
I have a question--

Try to explain the concept of infinity (infinite time, infinite universe, and subsequently that there is an infinite amount of stars and planets filling the universe)

Really, that's crazy.

What's even scaries is try to imagine nothing. No universe, no time, to life, no existance, just imagine nothing. Scares the crap out of me.
 
Not just about me. But think about nothingness. No suns, no planets, so galaxies, no anything.

Can there be absolute nothingness?

Was that the way it was before the big bang (if such a thing really happened)?

If everything in the Universe is moving away from each other, will we eventually have nothingness?


Where's Mike... :D
 
Not just about me. But think about nothingness. No suns, no planets, so galaxies, no anything.

irrelevant. If there was nothingness there'd be no consciousness so you wouldn't be able to actually think about it, no being would.

Nuff Said. :cool::D
 
If everything in the Universe is moving away from each other, will we eventually have nothingness?

Everything in the universe IS moving away from one another but that's because there is no emphasis there of family and more of a lean on individuality. Eventually Big Mama will pass and bring the universe back together again with a Grammy Award winning soundtrack produced by Mr. Quincy Jones.

Nuff Said. :cool:
 
For example, who was the first person to take some beans from a tree, decide to roast them, then decide to grind them, and finally, if that wasn't enough, decided to brew them in hot water and then have the courage to drink the first cup of coffee! And why?

Who decided it was a good idea to take perfectly good flour used for making bread (and who figured that one out!) and add some egg, milk and sugar and bake it to make a cake? And then, decided it needed a topping!

Why is the vast majority of the world's meat supply from only five animal families (cows, pigs, sheep, chickens and fish)??? Why not sparrows, foxes, lizards, elephants, tigers and zebras??? Did early man actually taste every animal on Earth and decided only a few tasted good?

In nature, bright colors tend to be a warning sign to stay away; flora and fauna that is poisonous. So who was the first soul brave enough to take a bite out of a bright red, big and round tomato??? And why aren't tomatoes found in the wild more? Birds like them; they should be abundant!

Who was the first person to write a word? Why did they do it? How did they do it? Were they burned at the stake for being a witch???

In the following sentence... "Billy read his red book yesterday, but Sally will read it today."... why are there two words that are spelled differently and mean different things, but sound the same??? And why are there two forms of the same word, present tense and past tense, pronounced differently, but still spelled the same???!!! (This one really bothers me!!!)

And for my final example... Why is Subject 805 greenish-brown? Who was the first person at Sideshow that said, "Hey, I know! Let's make him green!"? And why was it accepted and approved??

Does anyone else think about questions like this, or am I just too curious??? And if you don't think about questions like this, why not???

And finally, to wrap up this topic, 42!

Ahh yes, I have pondered on things such as this. The coffee bean. Could have been a source of dye, just as an example. In many cases one thing leads to another. A mistake ends up being an invention. Medicine men had to find new ways of retaining their power. New and exciting concoctions were to be had.

Then there's the bread, and cake. Well grains became a source of diet. Sick of chomping on grains, that are dry, man needed a drink and found the crushed grains and water had a new value. The adding of eggs was just a way to get kids to eat eggs. Sometimes things get added for no really good reason. Like why butter your bread and then put a spread on it? Just leave the butter off. Maybe because in poorer times lard and bread were cheap and readily available. Necessity being the mother of invention.

The animals that have been with us for so long, replicated readily, were easily domesticated and provided more than just food, but leather, clothing, musical instruments (horns), textiles, weird head gear, status, trade applications, manure, and a way to appease Satan (goat).

The brave young medicine man would experiment with untasted fruits, nuts, berries, leaves etc, to further his career. A social climber, who unknowingly, was already at the top of his game.

The first person to write a word was just a lousy artist.

English was invented by the English, a crazy mix of crazy marauding nationalities. Argumentative and defiant to the last breath. Self explanatory.

Subject 805 is just a pawn in some rebellious employees disenchantment of the system. Either that or it was a Hot Toys saboteur.
 
Back
Top