- Joined
- Sep 13, 2006
- Messages
- 8,780
- Reaction score
- 1,585
I'm also pretty sure the cat thing was mentioned specifically in the documentary. Sure, the guy deserved at least a few years for that, but not 18.
Where did you read he had the intent to rape the woman he put at gunpoint? That's completely made up. The woman was one of his family members. Even if all those things didn't have any explanation to them, like Zod said, it doesn't prove anything besides that he is a weird red neck.
Sorry I got some of the crimes and sentences wrong.
That cat killing was much earlier, and the six years he served was for the threatening his cousin at gunpoint, what his intent was isn't really relevant at this point, but the he did threaten her at gunpoint, which he was sentenced to six years, which he served concurrently for that first crime that he was falsely accused of.
I think the point is, overall the documentary left out a number of things that had a large impact on how Avery was portrayed. Had they put all those things in, the documentary wouldn't have been as compelling and you might have a more nuanced case. Avery would've been portrayed as a crazy redneck obsessed with this woman, rather than the backwoods simpleton that we saw.