Wait till you get to Eternals.Since Shang Shi-t is out in HD now, I decided to give it a go. Meh... phase 4 is definitely not starting strong.
Would it be wrong to say I'm glad I haven't paid for any of the phase 4 stuff yet? As far as D+ shows go, the only thing I've enjoyed is the Mandalorian but that one show is not enough to get me to subscribe.Wait till you get to Eternals.
Honestly, you've pretty much missed nothing. Next 3 movies, Spidey, Strange and maybe Thor might get things back in a positive direction. I'm out on Hawkeye and meh on She Hulk. She defends superheroes so maybe there might be something there. Doubt it though.Would it be wrong to say I'm glad I haven't paid for any of the phase 4 stuff yet? As far as D+ shows go, the only thing I've enjoyed is the Mandalorian but that one show is not enough to get me to subscribe.
I must be the only one that wasn’t blown away by daredevil. Idk whyOh jeez, I hadn't realized it's been that long, my how time flies. Daredevil S1 and S3 are masterclasses.
I gave WandaVision a chance and that was enough. I'm not interested in the other D+ Marvel stuff.Would it be wrong to say I'm glad I haven't paid for any of the phase 4 stuff yet? As far as D+ shows go, the only thing I've enjoyed is the Mandalorian but that one show is not enough to get me to subscribe.
Daredevil was uneven for me. When it worked it really worked, other times it was inconsistent, slow (common for Netflix) or trying too hard.I must be the only one that wasn’t blown away by daredevil. Idk why
https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-imax-enhanced/Excuse me if I’m asking or commenting in the wrong place.
But I would appreciate a clear explanation of “IMAX enhanced“ on my tv. Yesterday I signed on to Disney plus ( I‘ve had it for a month or two a couple of times in the past). I’ve googled the question but don’t seem to get an explanation that is clear to me.
I’ve tried to compare the two formats, alternating back and forth.
I see the usual “letterbox” in the widescreen format.
I see my whole television screen filled when in the “IMAX enhanced” format.
Of course I see the black bars at the top and bottom in the widescreen, but to my understanding I’m seeing the FULL picture as I would see in the movie theater.
Now , if I watch the “IMAX enhanced” and it fills my whole tv screen aren’t I cutting off information (or scenery) on the left and right side of my screen as I would if I used the “zoom” feature on my remote in the old widescreen format ?
Network tv has shows for 22/24 hours. DD had 12 for a season. Starting to think 6-8 hrs is good for a streaming show season.I must be the only one that wasn’t blown away by daredevil. Idk why
Short answer is that the previous versions were cropping the top and bottoms of the IMAX scenes but now you're finally seeing the whole picture.Excuse me if I’m asking or commenting in the wrong place.
But I would appreciate a clear explanation of “IMAX enhanced“ on my tv. Yesterday I signed on to Disney plus ( I‘ve had it for a month or two a couple of times in the past). I’ve googled the question but don’t seem to get an explanation that is clear to me.
I’ve tried to compare the two formats, alternating back and forth.
I see the usual “letterbox” in the widescreen format.
I see my whole television screen filled when in the “IMAX enhanced” format.
Of course I see the black bars at the top and bottom in the widescreen, but to my understanding I’m seeing the FULL picture as I would see in the movie theater.
Now , if I watch the “IMAX enhanced” and it fills my whole tv screen aren’t I cutting off information (or scenery) on the left and right side of my screen as I would if I used the “zoom” feature on my remote in the old widescreen format ?
Thank you Matticus,
Maybe a combination of vfx and actual props/costume?Big question though: Why in 2008 did Jeff Bridges look *perfect* in the Iron Monger when he removed the helmet yet Mark Ruffalo looked fake as hell when doing the same in the Hulkbuster a full decade later, lol.
Yep, watched it too. I figured Phase 4 would be a step back for Marvel based on their character announcements and losing big characters. I feel Marvel as a whole has put its best forward and it won't be duplicated or topped. I actually think Sony's Spider-Verse is on the rise.Since Shang Shi-t is out in HD now, I decided to give it a go. Meh... phase 4 is definitely not starting strong.
Yeah, plus with IM you know they were focusing all their attention on making that final fight look good compared to Banner Hulkbuster being much less important (snicker) in the overall scheme of IW. It's still just funny to see Bridges look so spot on in his armor with Ruffalo looking like something out of the early 2000's despite being a full decade later.Maybe a combination of vfx and actual props/costume?
No. They most likely would have created permanent parallel timelines that would have been left to whatever fates if The Ancient One was to be believed. But very few Avengers actually knew that amid the panicked game of keepaway they were playing in an attempt to literally save every living creature in their own universe.Rewatched the Endgame Battle...did anyone ever stop and ask themselves what was going to happen to the gauntlet when Cap Marvel tosses it in? Does it have it's own GPS locator?
Meanwhile a super soldier in Baltimore has something to say…No. They most likely would have created permanent parallel timelines that would have been left to whatever fates if The Ancient One was to be believed. But very few Avengers actually knew that amid the panicked game of keepaway they were playing in an attempt to literally save every living creature in their own universe.
Enter your email address to join: