It doesn't stack up though. According to their suppliers, Amarang, the last order they had for them was in November 2013. MB never paid for it and therefore never received the order. They were informing their customer's that they had a "huge delivery" before Christmas, which was causing the delay in getting orders posted to them. Although allegedly they hadn't actually done so. Which would mean, if true, they were taking orders for stock and supposedly in-stock items they didn't have.
If Amarang's statement concerning an unpaid invoice in November 2013 is correct, there is certainly a question as to why MB are claiming they did not have a problem until the January 17th demand for payment by Streamline.
Imho, an explanation should be supplied as to why there appeared to be no daily management oversight of MB's refund exposure.. surely MB should have been aware that allegedly no daily refunds had been processed by Streamline from October 2013 to January 2014 but that prior to October 2013 it was a normal daily procedure (as it is in any commercial enterprise)?
MB's claims of a failed attempt to attract venture capital would carry rather more weight, if there were details of who else was involved, apart from the MB management.. rumors of one of the venture capitalists from Dragons Den being involved are just that, rumors.. unless verifiable through an authoritative third party or the venture capital organisation concerned.
Without more information, it is extremely difficult to establish precisely what happened.. it should be remembered that if a commercial enterprise's order book is 'full' then the issue of 'insolvency' is largely a matter of cash flow and credit confidence.
Everyday in the financial news you will see Corporations' share price rise and fall on profit predictions and warnings.. Corporations routinely post losses of many millions of dollars on a quarters trading without their creditors panicking, provided there is a convincing and effective management plan for overcoming those losses commercially.
Very few companies trade on a full bank account, not even banks.. when Lehman Brothers went bust, its debts were valued at $613 billion and its assets were valued at £639 billion.. so technically that was despite having $26 billion more assets than debts, although accurate valuations in those circumstances are difficult.. and (lack of) confidence in those valuations was largely the cause of LB imploding.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/lehman-folds-with-record-613-billion-debt?siteid=rss
However the advice on the
BleedingCool Blog is sound, the first and best place to try to obtain a refund is through the method of payment.. Unfortunately going direct to a commercial enterprise that has gone bust, simply puts a customer in a long queue, often behind 'priority' creditors.. ie. Financial institutions and Commercial suppliers.