BadMoon
Demi G0D Overseer
Makes perfect sense.
I am grumpy today. Apologies.
Makes perfect sense.
I am grumpy today. Apologies.
Again thats just silly. how much money in reserve should someone have to own a dog that was just going to be destroyed at the shelter anyway? $10,000? $100,000? If your dog was 12 years old and I told you there is a new heart replacement surgery that can be done and it only costs $100,000 to do. If you declined do I get to tell you that you were a bad pet owner? Thats silly.
I'm sorry but I have to agree with Prog on this. There are a lot of loving pet owners who have to make the hard decision to put a loved pet down because they just can't afford it.Oh come on! LOL! That's the exact situation I just tried to describe using a cancer patient as an example. IF a heart replacement is even possible in a pet the chances are the pet isn't going to survive for very long. Not to mention if you are referring to a dog who is 12 depending on the breed they are likely on their way out. So of course you have a choice to make. For me that would be a situation where the animal would suffer at the expense of the owners on selfishness in wanting the pet to stay around.
Some animals put down are not even on "deaths door" but are suffering pain (hip dysplacia SP.)where the cost to treat is not feasible. I'm sorry, but in these times if it's going to cost over 2 grand to get an old dogs hip replaced or under a hundred bucks to get it humanely put down, most people, including myself will choose the latter.
Some animals put down are not even on "deaths door" but are suffering pain (hip dysplacia SP.)where the cost to treat is not feasible. I'm sorry, but in these times if it's going to cost over 2 grand to get an old dogs hip replaced or under a hundred bucks to get it humanely put down, most people, including myself will choose the latter.
I agree that if you can get help somewhere or sign the animal over to someone who will treat it to do that. But if it comes down to me having to pay for it and being out a couple thousand dollars or putting a pet down and keeping that money for something else, I know what I would do. Some will think I'm cruel but no matter how close I may feel towards a pet in my mind it is still an animal, sorry.The right thing to do would be to find another option before jumping straight to death. Many places and people would be willing to help out and take over the animal and see it through. There's always a better option to death when life can still be enjoyed by the animal. I'm $3000 and running on my parents dog without a job, while going to school, and trying to pay bills. Sure it would have been cheaper to put him down and 4 out of 5 vets told us to, but 3 months, thousands of dollars, and long road ahead still and Kodiak is thriving and as happy as he ever was and that's priceless. I don't regret a dime spent, and have sold off almost my entire collection on here as well as other things around my house to other places around town to help, I've taken on weekend labor jobs when I can find them and some really amazing boardies on here have made donations in one way or another to help out. I understand not everyone wants that responsibility but that's what life is about and when life is still an option it should be exhausted completely instead of jumping right to the easy and affordable way out.
I agree that if you can get help somewhere or sign the animal over to someone who will treat it to do that. But if it comes down to me having to pay for it and being out a couple thousand dollars or putting a pet down and keeping that money for something else, I know what I would do. Some will think I'm cruel but no matter how close I may feel towards a pet in my mind it is still an animal, sorry.
I will tell you a quick story that my wife told me that I thought was a real ____ thing to do. One weekend at her pt job a guy bought his animal in to be put down. What was wrong with the dog could be fixed and he could go onto live. The Dr. being the softie he is told the guy to sign him over to him and he would treat it on his dime and put it up for adoption when it was healthy. The guy refused and the Dr. had to put his animal down. Now that there is just horrible.
You have to weigh your options, no doubt. That's not the point of my comments.
My thing is, say you have animal swallow something. They are young and otherwise in good health. They need an operation to remove said item. There is no question in morbitity once the object is removed and the animal will be 100%. However, the owner decides they don't want to pay X. That is the situation I am talking about.
That is what you are saying now, and I agree with that, but that isn't what you said earlier. You made the statement earlier that if someone can't afford surgery for their pet, they should never have taken the responsibility for the pet in the first place. That is very different from someone who can afford the surgery, but chooses to put the pet down rather than pay for it, and doesn't even consider the "adoption" route.
It could be that many pet owners aren't aware of the options available rather than a "no one can own you but me" type mentality. I had no idea that all the groups posted in this thread even existed until now.
I stand by that. However people were quick to jump to extremes and maybe I wasn't clear. I forget that I'm not having a conversation and typing from my phone. It's like this. When you buy or adopt you should know that these situations are going to come up. It's just a matter of when. You have to get your pet fixed take them to annual vet visits and all of that. If you're not in a position to do this you shouldn't own a pet. Same with kids sir. People have kids all the time that don't get medical attention because their parents would rather spend their tax returns on an Xbox. It's sickening.
Enter your email address to join: