Go into ANY New Rain Man new release thread and it will escalate back and forth from an unbelievable level of doucheiness and elitism to actual constructive talk in a matter of minutes. lmaoo
And if you do that too often the mods aren't going to take you seriously either. I've been here 5 years and never clicked that button and I've been down right insulted. Just consider the source, give back as good as you get, or hit the ignore button.
Just been thereGo into ANY New Rain Man new release thread and it will escalate back and forth from an unbelievable level of doucheiness and elitism to actual constructive talk in a matter of minutes. lmaoo
Attempting to get involved in the conversation, I have found many members here to be condescending in their thread replies. Why is that?
The only thing I can think of is the average age must be around 16 by the maturity level displayed so far.
Can anyone prove me wrong?
Con... descending
Badum tish*
I'm here all week
Attempting to get involved in the conversation, I have found many members here to be condescending in their thread replies.
I have been on the site now for a little over three months, I find that in most threads the immaturity is from the same 4-5 members ALL the time.
Chase you good people.
Its true, I am a real pleasure to be around
........says his Ween.
Attempting to get involved in the conversation, I have found many members here to be condescending in their thread replies. Why is that?
Do you mean condescending in their replies to you in particular, or more generally? Presumably when you begin "attempting to get involved" you mean your attempts, and not those of others.
In which case to answer properly would mean going back through your posts and assessing whether a) the replies directed to you or about you were, in fact, condescending and b) to what extent might those responses be attributed to the typical demeanour and MO of the authors, or whether this condescension was specific to their replies to you.
Can anyone prove you wrong how? That those you perceive as condescending do not, in fact, possess the maturity of a 16 year old? That your perception of the respondents as condescending is wrong? Or that your perception of the board in general, that many of its members are given to condescension, is wrong?
Could you provide a specific example of what you mean?
Enter your email address to join: