Darklord Dave
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 3, 2005
- Messages
- 19,026
- Reaction score
- 81
I can't think of ANYONE who isn't happy about this.
Well, I'd bet that OJ is none too pleased...
O.J. Simpson Guilty
- Thread starter FQRizzo
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Well, I'd bet that OJ is none too pleased...
King Darkness
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2006
- Messages
- 44,456
- Reaction score
- 209
I hope he dies in prison.
The Ringer
Super Freak
Cell buddies
Kratos
Super Freak
Darth Madden
You Are A Tooooooy!!!
December 5th... and he better go away for a LONG, LONG time.
Darth Caedus
Formerly Congerking
Well technically, OJ was found NOT GUILTY, which does NOT mean innocent. It just meant Not Guilty of that particular crime by a jury.
Looks like he'll die in jail, which I have no problem with.
Looks like he'll die in jail, which I have no problem with.
customizerwannabe
An Evil Collector?
Sorry. Should've qualified that. No PERSON. He's an animal.
Chimera 1
Super Freak
You guys make it seem as if O.J. did something miraculous to get off on the first case. Have you forgotten that if the LA police wouldn't have been so gung-ho on trying to frame him, he would most likely be in prison for that (if he did it), I wasn't there so I wouldn't know 100% but you guys must have been there because you seem really sure he did it. I am not saying he did it and i am not saying he didn't but for him to go to prison for taking his own stuff back is sickening. When the sideshow stuff was taken, if you knew who took it wouldn't you have gone to the hotel room of the thief and tried to take it back? Let's not pass judgement on him simply because he was found not guilty on a case 13 years ago because the racist detective tried to frame him and screwed up. There are plenty of other people who got off for murdering someone. The system is not even close to perfect, as in this situation. if the case 13 years ago didn't haqppen would you still want him to go to prison? I hope none of you are wrongfully convicted of something simply because the jury already had your fate determined before they even swore in. I don't care about O.J. in the least bit, don't get me wrong. But you guys are better than this condemnation.
Chimera 1
Super Freak
I am not saying don't be happy that he is going to prison just be happy because you think he is guily of THIS crime. Not for a crime that a jury of 12 said he was not guilty of 13 years ago. If he did it 13 years ago then he got what he deserves, if he didn't then this is the justice system gone wrong...again. No matter who it is, I don't like the guilty set free or the innocent convicted. The guilty should be convicted for the crime they are guilty of not for a crime they are actually innocent of even if it is after they got away with a previous crime. I hope that makes some sense. It has nothing to do with O.J. himself. I blame the LA police for him not being tried appropriately 13 years ago.
Anzik
Super Freak
There is a ton of blame to go around for the first fiasco.
#1 Lance Ito!! As soon as he allowed cameras in the court room he made it a celebrity event. Plus he should have thrown out the verdict.
#2 The LA Police Dept. They were sloppy but I don't think you can say they framed him. Because of how high profile this case was and how high profile the forensic evidence was it brought about new importance given to the collection of evidence. In fact I would say that the CSI shows are a direct result of people seeing how important forensics can be. Cops have an incredibly hard job and this case was magnified because of its nature.
#3 The prosecutors were so busy trying to look Hollywood on camera they forgot they had a job to do.
#4 The Jury who allowed themselves to be manipulated By Cochran.
I look at his behavior since the murders. He lost the civil suit so he basically retired so the Goldmann's couldn't collect a dime, and he spent the rest of his time enjoying his comfy lifestyle.
The case at hand however, he felt it was his right to break into another person's room and hold him there with threats of bodily harm and confiscated what he says belonged to him. A rather 'self centered' and self important action. The man is a pathological narcissist and feels he can do anything he wants regardless of the law.
#1 Lance Ito!! As soon as he allowed cameras in the court room he made it a celebrity event. Plus he should have thrown out the verdict.
#2 The LA Police Dept. They were sloppy but I don't think you can say they framed him. Because of how high profile this case was and how high profile the forensic evidence was it brought about new importance given to the collection of evidence. In fact I would say that the CSI shows are a direct result of people seeing how important forensics can be. Cops have an incredibly hard job and this case was magnified because of its nature.
#3 The prosecutors were so busy trying to look Hollywood on camera they forgot they had a job to do.
#4 The Jury who allowed themselves to be manipulated By Cochran.
I look at his behavior since the murders. He lost the civil suit so he basically retired so the Goldmann's couldn't collect a dime, and he spent the rest of his time enjoying his comfy lifestyle.
The case at hand however, he felt it was his right to break into another person's room and hold him there with threats of bodily harm and confiscated what he says belonged to him. A rather 'self centered' and self important action. The man is a pathological narcissist and feels he can do anything he wants regardless of the law.
Chimera 1
Super Freak
I agree with you on everything but part of 2 and all of 4. let me start with 4. Cochran did his job, and that includes bringing up obvious points that prove reasonable doubt (not innocence). I truly hate to say it but the glove was to small. Also the blood found had a preservative in it which brings me to #2. The glove was planted since it wasn't the right size, the blood had preservatives in it which means it was stored and then dropped, and there were other things that didn't add up but Since no one was charged and convicted with tampering with or planting evidence, there is an arguable fact that it was bad evidence collecting.
Your are absolutely right that he is a pathological narcissist but if your stuff was stolen wouldn't you try to go get it back especially when the cops refused to help you out? Yes he did call the cops first and they refused to look into it.
Also how many of you record your transactions at the conferences when you buy colectibles? Show of hands please? regardless of the previous case, he was wrongfully convicted in this instance.
What goes around.........
He got 15 years:
https://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/a137661/oj-simpson-jailed-for-15-years.html
x
He got 15 years:
https://www.digitalspy.co.uk/showbiz/a137661/oj-simpson-jailed-for-15-years.html
x
Darth Madden
You Are A Tooooooy!!!
I think its a minimum of 8... so I am guessing he will serve 10 total.
Darth Caedus
Formerly Congerking
I hope someone shanks him in the joint, OZ style
GrueSam
The Queen of Darkness
I think it's likely that there will at least be attempts...
RJMacReady16
Super Freak
Karma, as they say, truly is a b^^^^....
Similar threads
