People are just dumb
Obamas tax plan
- Thread starter hoodonit00
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Status
Where the hell do these people come from? Bunch of damn a-holes.
RoboDad
Super Freak
That's OK. People who vote against McCain just because there are stupid people in the world only make we want to vote for him.
And the world goes 'round and 'round.
RoboDad
Super Freak
No, you don't understand. These must be evil right-wingers disguised as Obama supporters, in a sick attempt to discredit him. Clearly, we have been shown that only conservatives are stupid and mean-spirited. And anyone who claims otherwise is childish.
jbinny
Super Freak
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 4,417
- Reaction score
- 0
obama's policies are going to drive us even further towars socialism and his good buddy william ayers is as clos to a terrorist as you can find, so what do you expect people to say?
LChinoz
Super Freak
I think they heard that McCain once called his wife that (has not been verified if true or not) and are using it. Not cool anyway.
LChinoz
Super Freak
RoboDad
Super Freak
PLEASE tell me you aren't seriously trying to spin this t-shirt report so that somehow it really is McCain's fault (even in a tangential way). Because that would be utter HOGWASH!
LChinoz
Super Freak
https://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Jake_Tappers_questions_answered.html?showall
"She added that McCain had, allegedly, used the word himself, "so is it really that offensive?" And she said none of the people pictured were Democrats."
Like I said, this is NOT okay. Earlier today I read about it and saw this reasoning from one of the t-shirt wearing people. I just report news
See, no slant from me
I wouldn't go so far as to calling her a ^^^^,much less wearing a T-shirt that's says "Sarah Palin is a ^^^^".But she is annoying as hell,and in your face fake.
But yeah,they're everywhere.
TO ALL MY FRIENDS...
LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE...
> > FYI only.
>
> > George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years. The first six the
> economy was fine.
> > A little over one year ago:
> > 1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high
> > 2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon
> > 3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%
> > 4) The DOW JONES hit a record high-- 14,000 +
> > 5) American's were buying new cars, taking
> > cruises, vacations overseas, living large!
> > But American's wanted 'CHANGE'! So, in
> 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress
> > and yes--we got 'CHANGE' all right. In the PAST YEAR:
> > 1) Consumer confidence has plummeted
> > 2) Gasoline has recently been over $4 a gallon and climbing!
> > 3) Unemployment is up to 6.1% (a 12% increase) and increasing
> > 4) Americans have seen their home equity
> > drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS and prices are still dropping
> > 5) 1.5% of American homes are in foreclosure
> > 6) as I write, after a major crash last week THE DOW is probing another
> > low ~~ TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS HAVE EVAPORATED FROM THEIR STOCKS,
> > BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT AND RETIREMENT PORTFOLIOS!
> > YES, IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE...AND WE SURE GOT IT!
> >
> > REMEMBER THE PRESIDENT HAS NO CONTROL OVER ANY OF THESE ISSUES,
> ONLY CONGRESS DOES.
> >
> > AND WHAT HAS CONGRESS DONE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS?
> & gt; ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
> >
> > NOW THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO
> REALLY GIVE US CHANGE, AND HE HAS THE BACKING OF A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!!
> >
> > JUST HOW MUCH MORE 'CHANGE' DO YOU THINK WE CAN STAND?
LIBERAL OR CONSERVATIVE...
> > FYI only.
>
> > George Bush has been in office for 7 1/2 years. The first six the
> economy was fine.
> > A little over one year ago:
> > 1) Consumer confidence stood at a 2 1/2 year high
> > 2) Regular gasoline sold for $2.19 a gallon
> > 3) The unemployment rate was 4.5%
> > 4) The DOW JONES hit a record high-- 14,000 +
> > 5) American's were buying new cars, taking
> > cruises, vacations overseas, living large!
> > But American's wanted 'CHANGE'! So, in
> 2006 they voted in a Democratic Congress
> > and yes--we got 'CHANGE' all right. In the PAST YEAR:
> > 1) Consumer confidence has plummeted
> > 2) Gasoline has recently been over $4 a gallon and climbing!
> > 3) Unemployment is up to 6.1% (a 12% increase) and increasing
> > 4) Americans have seen their home equity
> > drop by $12 TRILLION DOLLARS and prices are still dropping
> > 5) 1.5% of American homes are in foreclosure
> > 6) as I write, after a major crash last week THE DOW is probing another
> > low ~~ TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS HAVE EVAPORATED FROM THEIR STOCKS,
> > BONDS & MUTUAL FUNDS INVESTMENT AND RETIREMENT PORTFOLIOS!
> > YES, IN 2006 AMERICA VOTED FOR CHANGE...AND WE SURE GOT IT!
> >
> > REMEMBER THE PRESIDENT HAS NO CONTROL OVER ANY OF THESE ISSUES,
> ONLY CONGRESS DOES.
> >
> > AND WHAT HAS CONGRESS DONE IN THE LAST TWO YEARS?
> & gt; ABSOLUTELY NOTHING.
> >
> > NOW THE DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR PRESIDENT CLAIMS HE IS GOING TO
> REALLY GIVE US CHANGE, AND HE HAS THE BACKING OF A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS!!!!
> >
> > JUST HOW MUCH MORE 'CHANGE' DO YOU THINK WE CAN STAND?
RoboDad
Super Freak
Well, I would NOT go so far as to call the lunatic ravings of the person wearing the shirt as "news". And it certainly doesn't make it "fact".https://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Jake_Tappers_questions_answered.html?showall
"She added that McCain had, allegedly, used the word himself, "so is it really that offensive?" And she said none of the people pictured were Democrats."
Like I said, this is NOT okay. Earlier today I read about it and saw this reasoning from one of the t-shirt wearing people. I just report news
See, no slant from me
It just struck me that your denouncement of the tactic was somewhat backhanded, simply by including the reference to the shirt-wearer's comments. It comes across sort of as "yes, it was a bad thing to do, but McCain and Palin deserved it".
Now, can we please get back to discussing Obama's tax plan. I am just SO excited to know that my tax bracket is going to go up to 45% under the new Emperor.
Those people are scary. Those are the idiots that have believed the emails, ads, etc out there the Republican party or its affiliates have put out there. The same goes for the other side as well not saying that there isn't the games being played by the Dems.
The sad thing is these are the types of people that will make up a decent portion of the base of voters. While the rest of us who care about the actual issues that will have an affect on us get let to try and discuss things.
The sad thing is these are the types of people that will make up a decent portion of the base of voters. While the rest of us who care about the actual issues that will have an affect on us get let to try and discuss things.
OK SITHLORD
Super Freak
No matter who is in office, things will stay the same or get worse, i'm afraid. Doubt either of the two will make a difference. Time to start buying guns!!
canned foods are good as well!
customizerwannabe
An Evil Collector?
Dem and Repubs have their share of quacks. People that pay any attention to them at all, are wasting their time. It's not news any more than Jerry Springer was.
Spartan Rex
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
- Messages
- 8,130
- Reaction score
- 381
Why these cant be democrats, only republicans do this stuff:
https://www.katu.com/news/30847164.html
Palin pwns hippie heckler
https://video.aol.com/video-detail/palin-hassles-heckler-wins-applause/3227981057/?icid=VIDLRVNWS02
(The Wall st Journal article summed up for those with ADD)
Obamas slight of hand
The Wall Street Journal today debunks what it rightly calls Barack Obama's 95% illusion, explaining how Barack can promise a "tax cut" for 95% of "working families" when, in fact, 33% of Americans already pay no income taxes at all.
What would otherwise seem like another Obamessiah miracle -- surprise! -- really isn't. Rather, Barack has simply redefined the meaning of "tax cut." He's counting refundable "tax credits" -- that is, government handouts -- as "tax cuts," and planning to subsidize them by sharp income tax increases on "the wealthy." As the Journal explains:
The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year. The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS.
Obama's "tax cuts" have nothing to do with letting people who earn money through their own hard work or talents keep more of it. Rather, it's about punishing the people who create jobs, and allowing the government to redistribute income to make all of us more "equal." Well, at least more equally dependent on the government.
If you think the problem with America is that not enough of us count on the government to do enough for us, you should love Barack's 95% illusion.
https://www.katu.com/news/30847164.html
Palin pwns hippie heckler
https://video.aol.com/video-detail/palin-hassles-heckler-wins-applause/3227981057/?icid=VIDLRVNWS02
(The Wall st Journal article summed up for those with ADD)
Obamas slight of hand
The Wall Street Journal today debunks what it rightly calls Barack Obama's 95% illusion, explaining how Barack can promise a "tax cut" for 95% of "working families" when, in fact, 33% of Americans already pay no income taxes at all.
What would otherwise seem like another Obamessiah miracle -- surprise! -- really isn't. Rather, Barack has simply redefined the meaning of "tax cut." He's counting refundable "tax credits" -- that is, government handouts -- as "tax cuts," and planning to subsidize them by sharp income tax increases on "the wealthy." As the Journal explains:
The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year. The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS.
Obama's "tax cuts" have nothing to do with letting people who earn money through their own hard work or talents keep more of it. Rather, it's about punishing the people who create jobs, and allowing the government to redistribute income to make all of us more "equal." Well, at least more equally dependent on the government.
If you think the problem with America is that not enough of us count on the government to do enough for us, you should love Barack's 95% illusion.
Last edited:
Why these cant be democrats, only republicans do this stuff:
https://www.katu.com/news/30847164.html
Palin pwns hippie heckler
https://video.aol.com/video-detail/palin-hassles-heckler-wins-applause/3227981057/?icid=VIDLRVNWS02
(The Wall st Journal article summed up for those with ADD)
Obamas slight of hand
The Wall Street Journal today debunks what it rightly calls Barack Obama's 95% illusion, explaining how Barack can promise a "tax cut" for 95% of "working families" when, in fact, 33% of Americans already pay no income taxes at all.
What would otherwise seem like another Obamessiah miracle -- surprise! -- really isn't. Rather, Barack has simply redefined the meaning of "tax cut." He's counting refundable "tax credits" -- that is, government handouts -- as "tax cuts," and planning to subsidize them by sharp income tax increases on "the wealthy." As the Journal explains:
The Tax Foundation estimates that under the Obama plan 63 million Americans, or 44% of all tax filers, would have no income tax liability and most of those would get a check from the IRS each year. The Heritage Foundation's Center for Data Analysis estimates that by 2011, under the Obama plan, an additional 10 million filers would pay zero taxes while cashing checks from the IRS.
Obama's "tax cuts" have nothing to do with letting people who earn money through their own hard work or talents keep more of it. Rather, it's about punishing the people who create jobs, and allowing the government to redistribute income to make all of us more "equal." Well, at least more equally dependent on the government.
If you think the problem with America is that not enough of us count on the government to do enough for us, you should love Barack's 95% illusion.
McCain has played word games with a lot of stuff as well. So both are doing it but in the long run I think the "actual" end of Obama's stuff will be better for the Middle/lower class.
Are you willing to admit that McCain has done this as well Spartan or do you believe he's telling the whole truth?
LChinoz
Super Freak
Nope, neither of them deserved this. You misread my post
I was putting her comments into persepctive, not defending her. Similar to the lipstick on a pig fiasco (where people thought Obama's comment was related to Palin's speech at the RNC), some people think these shirts were related to the previous story on the campaign trail about McCain's temper and the c-word. We really don't know. In the end there is no defending these vile attacks form either side.
Only the Lower class. The Middle class is going to take it in the shorts.
- Status
