Re: <> DX10 T2 T800 - OMG Photo Review - P1~2 / Collection P13 <>
I'll be honest with you, my camera captured what it saw with the particular lighting and lighting angles I was using. My camera wasn't lying. But then neither do I think other peoples clear camera shots in normal lighting are lying. I have looked at my figure under normal conditions and though that the PERS looks too wierd, the eyes too delineated by the thick eyelids that recess the eyes in more than they should be. I'm willing to overlook it though considering the things that to me are a definite improvement on the old figure like the overall shape of the face, the less harsh features and the superior body proportions and because I've seen how even the PERS can look good.
A response to Valfars post to me.
So. Would you say a-dev's photo's in his Pescadero photo shot are a true representation then?
I must say it looks much better without glasses in those photo's, but I thought it might have been that a-dev spent more time creating shadow to hide the flaws.
I'll be honest with you, my camera captured what it saw with the particular lighting and lighting angles I was using. My camera wasn't lying. But then neither do I think other peoples clear camera shots in normal lighting are lying. I have looked at my figure under normal conditions and though that the PERS looks too wierd, the eyes too delineated by the thick eyelids that recess the eyes in more than they should be. I'm willing to overlook it though considering the things that to me are a definite improvement on the old figure like the overall shape of the face, the less harsh features and the superior body proportions and because I've seen how even the PERS can look good.