Predalien Vs Newborn !

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Those aliens in Resurrection were not true aliens. They were born from a "successful" clone of Ripley who had a Queen fetus inside of her. In that manner, the aliens looked different from the previous movies and they could actually be weaker than "true" aliens. The Queen could've been softer too. Somehow, with all that genetic tampering, the Queen could give birth to that monstrosity we know as the newborn.

I would say the newborn is probably a birth defect. No tail and no inner teeth (I can't remember if it did have them or not). Plus, it cried, "Momma! Nooooo!" while being sucked out the hole in the ship. I doubt the predalien would cry like that if it was in the same situation.
 
i say predalien, cus the newborn may have demolished the queen but she wasnt ready for that, and if she was, or in this case if the predalien is, the predalien would win

That's like attacking a woman just after she's given birth....which is essentially what it was...An aware queen would tear the newborn to bits...and probably the Predalien too...

The AvP one at least....size of a freakin' Tyrannosaurus....
 
same , I have always liked the newborn design , thought it looked very creepy.

Me too - Newborn and Predalien are great movie monsters.

I mean really, do we want to just see the same exact creatures in every single movie? Some variety is a good thing. This is why I enjoy the Aliens and Predator comics also.

Resurrection was actually a really great action flick that constantly gets slammed by all the purists out there. If they kept pumping out a rehashed versions of the first two flicks, I would have gotten bored with the franchise and been out a long time ago.
 
The new-born was actually a good idea and made sense looked cool as well 1/6th please hot toys
 
Back
Top