gin007
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2018
- Messages
- 324
- Reaction score
- 117
The vitreol was in your assumption of direct intent to disparage you from my quoted words, and then the wounded sarcasm with the please enlighten we loyal blind people bit.
And progress on to have a veiled dig at my ego statements to try and imply a flawed character trait,which I addressed where I have stated I am just as guilty of egotistical behaviour,but try and learn from the bruising where I can, but Iwill offer a defence if I believe it is warranted.
You took direct offense when none was intended toward you directly or indirectly and the thought it needed the added sardonic wit to enforce your point....vitriolic...
But hey ho you carry on its your opinion and mistaken belief that you were pointed out for direct criticism and you are free to hold that opinion as I am free to offer oppostion and debate to it.
Well, you replied to my comment, quoted it, and then said "to blindly believe that Mr Tam is above criticism or reproach doesnt help growth but reinforces egos that may need a little reduction in size to progress in future." And then you said you respected my loyalty. So who else would you be referring to? No one here, I would expect, is blindly following anyone else.
The "veiled dig" and whatever you mean by "imply a flawed character trait" - I have no idea what you are talking about. I was honestly asking why you are attacking a man's character when no one has all the facts. I am honestly curious about what you think it will accomplish. Unless you are not out to accomplish anything and are just venting.
But thank you for all your colorful adjectives about me, my thoughts, and my intentions.
Sent from my SM-N975U1 using Tapatalk