generalszabo
Super Freak
Those eyes/eyelids are defo off. I might just stick with my gentle giant after all
Ask and you shall receiveIn fairness to the statue, I don't think a lot of these grainy quality pictures are doing her justice. I'd really like to see it in the hands of someone who can use a camera.
I'm questioning my order too (white version) but will see how I feel in hand.I think it matches the prototype pretty closely, which unfortunately was a bit off as well. I had this on PO at Spec Fiction with a 250 deposit during the height of my Avengers mania and once that subsided, I ate the deposit and avoided the remaining balance plus shipping. I've never done that with a PO before but ultimately I didn't want to throw good money at bad. I would've kept it had my mania not subsided and my focus shifted back to strictly Star Wars as it's not terrible, just not a home run.
I agree with most of what you're saying but that 'real' pic of scarjo has been photoshopped to death, it's not a great comparisonI just saw the YouTube video on BSC saying "it's not that bad"... for this price point,
it needs to be better than it is.
This isn't a $300 Hot Toys figure where the likeness is "subjective".
This is a $1,500 statue that has a portrait that looks nothing like the actress.
Look at this and tell me I'm wrong.
- Eyes - 100% not right
- Nose - Looks off
- Bottom Jaw / Face - Looks too wide
- Lips - Nowhere near full enough
And I mean, c'mon... she is freaking cross-eyed! For $1,500?!?
View attachment 606860
I've been saying that Queen Studios is sliding on quality and taking on too much at once.
This is proof of that. I'm scared of pieces like that $4,000 Loki I ordered and the Cap & Thor LSB.
$1,500? Is that really how much she cost for US collectors?I just saw the YouTube video on Batman Statue Collector with him saying "it's not that bad"... for this price point,
because it "looks like the prototype"... he has lost his mind. It needs to be WAY better than it is.
This isn't a $300 1/6 Hot Toys figure where the likeness is "subjective".
This is a $1,500 1/4 statue that has a portrait that looks nothing like the actress.
Look at this and tell me I'm wrong.
- Eyes - 100% not right
- Nose - Looks off
- Bottom Jaw / Face - Looks too wide
- Lips - Nowhere near full enough
And I mean, c'mon... she even looks freaking cross-eyed! For $1,500?!?
View attachment 606860
I've been saying that Queen Studios is sliding on quality and taking on too much at once.
This is proof of that. I'm scared of pieces like that $4,000 Loki I ordered and the Cap & Thor LSB.
The nose is actually 100% on point.I just saw the YouTube video on Batman Statue Collector with him saying "it's not that bad"... for this price point,
because it "looks like the prototype"... he has lost his mind. It needs to be WAY better than it is.
This isn't a $300 1/6 Hot Toys figure where the likeness is "subjective".
This is a $1,500 1/4 statue that has a portrait that looks nothing like the actress.
Look at this and tell me I'm wrong.
- Eyes - 100% not right
- Nose - Looks off
- Bottom Jaw / Face - Looks too wide
- Lips - Nowhere near full enough
And I mean, c'mon... she even looks freaking cross-eyed! For $1,500?!?
View attachment 606860
I've been saying that Queen Studios is sliding on quality and taking on too much at once.
This is proof of that. I'm scared of pieces like that $4,000 Loki I ordered and the Cap & Thor LSB.
Enter your email address to join: