I thought that was pretty cool. Thanks for sharing.
Not necessarily. It's quite different from those in a lot of ways.
If you're a fan of the series I say go for it especially since I've seen new copies of the game for around $30. However it is far from being a masterpiece so just don't expect to much from this game.
I'm definetly a "softcore" fan I would say. For example, I only played RE4 and 5, and none of the older releases. But 4 was super fun, and 5 was the same thing, maybe slightly less fun (since the gameplay is pretty much a repeat to someone like me).
Is 6 bad because the storyline is terrible, or is the gameplay actually worse compared to the previous two installments?
Thanks! I've always felt the storylines were a little funky. 4 was not bad imo, and 5 got a little funky.
If the core gameplay and pace is about the same, then I should like 6. I'll plan on fetching it once its available on steam.
RE4 practically had no story, more of a sidestory if anything. RE5 got back to the main story continued off from Code Veronica.
RE5 would of been good if it wasn't zombies with AK's
Re4 wasnt funky?!
i think the most things on 4 was more strange or funky.
Don't forget all the blue and green fire, zelda dungeons and traps in the castle, laser room shenanigans, etc.
Even Mercs Mode sucks. I like 4 or 5 better.
Sent from Umbrella Corporation HQ using Tapatalk
Re4 wasnt funky?!
Enter your email address to join: