Captain Britain
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 3,596
- Reaction score
- 6
No reason to flame you, I agree it sill hasn't looked best in the photos, but being experienced with these figures and photos as well as Tin's photos, I can fill in gaps but if you take them at face value, I can see why they don't look the best yet. Tin's photo work is great as far as lighting and all, but I notice in a lot of the shots, there's a faintness or something to the figures that doesn't quite represent the figure best. Tin's TDK Batman shots look great but the figure itself looks a little iffy compared to the final product, I'm sure Indy'll be the same.
I do think the hatted HS looks better with every new photo, and I'll be very interested to see what a great repaint does to it. I have to disagree about TDK Batman - the figure in hand looks as good to me as any photo I've ever seen of it.
As for my calling it garish, maybe that's just the colour of the plastic, the lighting or God knows what, but I'm seeing a lot of baby colours - pink and blue (for the eyes) - when the colours that first come to mind when you think of Ford as Indy are brown (stubble) and light brown (suntanned skin). Is the plastic a standard colour? Only Indiana Jones spends a lot of time in the sun. And Ford's eyes might be blue but you never 'see' the blue the same way you look at Daniel Craig and the first thing you think is 'wow, never seen eyes as blue as that before'.
I know, picky, picky. It still looks more like Ford than the Cinemaquette at a fraction of the price.