I really think that's not applicable anymore. Look at the latest 2 1/6 offered by SSC - Grievous and this. They are stepping up their game and starting to play in HT's sandbox. And as mentioned earlier in this thread - this figure is comparable to Iron Monger which was only $20 cheaper 2 years ago. And Raynor has more lights, more parts, etc.
Yeah, I think Sideshow has great potential with their figures, and I'm not just talking complex engineering, but even with more basic figures that often have great sculpts and start out with the intention of a top notch figure being produced. Look at all the amazing Grove sculpts they've had access to, and even clothing done by Kato in a few instances. But execution isn't always there. Recently, look at Kato's great pics of his Cobra Commander versus the one we saw at SDCC (apparently an approximation of the production figure) where the clothing looked sloppy and ill-fitting. I'm hopeful about their apparent new head production/painting process with the Hoth Star Wars guys, but their execution on production pieces frequently hasn't lived up to figures' potential in the past, and that's where the biggest gap lies between SSC and Hot Toys IMO.I agree in terms of price... and this does look to have a comparable (or even better) value to the Monger. But it's the finished product that is most important. Sideshow's dropped the ball on few expensive releases. This could either be a masterpieces, or a $500 hot mess.
The closest 1/6 example from Sideshow I can think of is IG-88. Overall a great figure... but the light-up feature was tempermental and poorly designed. The articulation was tricky and could easily be damaged and the paint work was pretty basic... it was good enough, but not at the level of weathering/price point we see from 3A.
So it will be interesting to see if Sideshow is actually able to deliver on a figure with this kind of price tag and not have any major QC issues or wtf issues (like Kenobi's plastic belt) that seems to plague them.