Star Ace Harry Potter Sixth Scale Figure

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yeah sure but if a "bakery" is where a baker makes bread and such. And opposite is the reverse of something what is a "baker's opposite" as used by Rowling in chapter 1 to mean bakery.

This convo made me look up the difference. And yeah for a US audience all the switches I've seen perfect sense to me. As does the title switch. It's good to know British children are rised up on centuries old myths but it's a bit different here. I would never expect a child to know pilosopher is a term used in alchemy much less what alchemy is.

Which is exactly why Scholastic changed it :)

At the end of the day, whether you agree with the title change or not, my point is we ALL know what we're talking about when we say "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone" or "Sorcerer's Stone."

I think what Manannin was getting at was they changed what the author wanted, which makes marketing sense, of course, but it's still a shame.

Mind you, I am definitely biased on this one.
 
Which is exactly why Scholastic changed it :)

At the end of the day, whether you agree with the title change or not, my point is we ALL know what we're talking about when we say "Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone" or "Sorcerer's Stone."

I think what Manannin was getting at was they changed what the author wanted, which makes marketing sense, of course, but it's still a shame.

Mind you, I am definitely biased on this one.

Lol agreed except maybe our definitions of shame is different too :lol
 
:hi5:

Also, nowadays, need for changing the title would depend on what US marketing would say/think, but titles don't often change - covers definitely do though! Rarely have a UK and US cover that's the same. *New can of worms opened*

It's an awesome story, no matter what freakin' words are changed and the SA Figures are great too.

I'm sure we all agree on that one! :)

Well, maybe. . .
 
Yep! I was surprised to read today that the British versions don't have the little illustrations at the beginning of the chapters. Love those!
 
Exactly! The US have had a lot of cool memorabilia that we don't have here too. I have the new US Scholastic boxset with Hogwarts on the spines - it's my fav. I also love the US kids versions of the covers.

Back on Topic (sorry guys):I know some people don't like them, but I really like what Star Ace have done with the boxes. Especially seeing as they're pictures of kids on two of them, but aimed at adult collectors.
 
So what your saying is every country should know every other countries slang,grammar, spelling and sentence structure...ok.

Pretty sure Captain America was never intended to be portrayed different in other countries. But he is.

Not at all, I was just saying a story set in the UK makes sense to have people speak like they do in that country.
People in all American movies and books use American slang, grammar, spelling and sentence structure, the rest of the world copes ok understanding them, surely the other way around isn't such a big task? The things that were changed were not so hard to understand. I know Americans call a fringe "bangs" so when someone mentions them in a U.S. movie or TV show, I understand. I like the differences in cultures, I don't want the whole world to speak the same. The differences make things more interesting.

I didn't mean any harshness in my earlier post, I was merely saying I personally think it is a shame the original text was changed, and as people have said the author agrees it wasn't the best choice.
Would you rather Shakespeare was americanised for you? Of course not, it's accepted how it is as a classic. I believe the Harry Potter series will be eventually too. Probably not to the level Shakespeare is but still.

I didn't know about the Philosopher's Stone or Nicholas Flamel before I read the book, but I heard he was a real guy so I looked him up and I learned something. And I have no knowledge of alchemy other than a basic grasp of the concept of it, but again Dumbledore explained all you need to know for the purpose of the story.

As far as I am aware, the only localisation in Captain America was his list of things to look up. I think that was more for humour than for clarity. I am pretty sure most people would have heard of both Nirvana (US release) and The Beatles (European release), it was just a little joke section for fans.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, including me, so there's no need for hostility.
 
Interestingly as the books go along there are fewer and fewer changes from the UK to US publisher. Either Jo started writing more internationally, or they figured that they'd better not touch it after they became best sellers.
 
I think I saw in one of the behind the scenes features on the BD box set that she was able to control things more and keep it how she wanted. The same way she did with the movies including casting etc.
Once things really started getting popular she became more protective. Which is great as other than the changes from the first two movies into the third, things were pretty consistent. More so than many other series anyway.
This is just speculation, but I think the consistencies with these books/movies and the LOTR movies are what led companies such as Marvel to believe they could achieve consistency across multiple features allowing projects like the MCU to happen. They are much more intricately linked than many other series/sequels.

Meanwhile, back on topic, I just picked up the Voldemort figure (not arrived yet) and I think Moody will be an addition soon too. I can't quite decide on Harry though, I can't put my finger on it but the face seems off to me. But the accessories alone are a great addition, and Harry didn't spend a lot of time in his robes (I mean he was more casual...) so again it would be a nice piece to display alone.
I would like a Hallows Harry or GoF Triwizard version though some day.
 
Not at all, I was just saying a story set in the UK makes sense to have people speak like they do in that country.
People in all American movies and books use American slang, grammar, spelling and sentence structure, the rest of the world copes ok understanding them, surely the other way around isn't such a big task? The things that were changed were not so hard to understand. I know Americans call a fringe "bangs" so when someone mentions them in a U.S. movie or TV show, I understand. I like the differences in cultures, I don't want the whole world to speak the same. The differences make things more interesting.

As far as I am aware, the only localisation in Captain America was his list of things to look up. I think that was more for humour than for clarity. I am pretty sure most people would have heard of both Nirvana (US release) and The Beatles (European release), it was just a little joke section for fans.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, including me, so there's no need for hostility.

I don't think anyone was being hostile in this conversation.

I also think other developed countries are more sensitized to American culture through entertainment and such whereas Americans aren't by other countries as much. With movies the emotion of a word can be just as important as the definition of the word. Something that doesn't translate to books. Kingsman is a great recent example of that. I have no idea half the stuff that comes out of the stepfathers mouth, but I understand the context through emotion. There isn't a huge accessible market for foreign film in the US. The majority of US films are distributed all over. If I read the sentence in a book, "The woman's hair was dyed blonde, but the fringe was blue." I would say why is the edge of her hair blue? Why because I'm not nearly as close to British culture as you are to American apparently. You clearly have more outlets to be. What it comes down to words and languages are confusing for other of not the same.

Captain America: The First Avenger was changed to just The First Avenger to appease some oversea crowds. Just as he was placed behind Iron Man to skew his role and make Tony seem like the leader of the Avengers in the AOU posters in asian markets where Tony is favored.

Anyhoo...I don't think there is any question we'll see Hallows Harry. But SS/PS Harry is great in hand beside the slightly off face. Highly recommend him if your gonna go far into the line. Plus he's the first release, which might help later down the road with value and resale when he becomes rare. Voldemort is my favorite by far to this point. Ordered Moody today.
 
We should just retitle the first book 'Harry Potter's Stones' and let the world sort out which one it is depending on where they are xD
 
Anyhoo...I don't think there is any question we'll see Hallows Harry. But SS/PS Harry is great in hand beside the slightly off face. Highly recommend him if your gonna go far into the line. Plus he's the first release, which might help later down the road with value and resale when he becomes rare. Voldemort is my favorite by far to this point. Ordered Moody today.

There's my problem, I never intend to go far into the various lines. But as is always the case, I usually do... Which means I will probably pick him up too!
 
Greedy UK retailers want £99 for the casual Harry and Ron figures. So, that's around $150. I knew they'd rip us off over it.

I was ordering several of each figure, but the prices are far too high here for me to do that now, which is a shame because I wanted at least an extra one of each to keep sealed in its box. So annoyed.

I'm trying to find alternative suppliers, but not having much luck. Looks like I'll have to order from China.
 
Star Ace was there, but wasn't showing off anything that's not already available to order.

SDCC2015-Star-Ace-at-Yes-Anime-Booth-010.jpg
 
Back
Top