I think they are right it would need to be seriously updated and need a higher production cost . In a world on game of thrones and west world TV show this thing better better be knocking out of the park and not just another run of the mill scfi channel show.I don't understand CBS reasoning when they say Star Trek isn't a good fit for television. Weren't FIVE previous Star Trek shows aired on television? Each one was successful in their own right. Enterprise had and has plenty of fans, of which I am one to this day. Enterprise went four seasons which is one whole season more than the original series did. Star Trek was born, lived and survived on television in first run and syndication practically non stop since 1966 but CBS says Star Trek Discovery wouldn't make it or survive on broadcast TV? I really can't get that. What crystal ball told them that?
Like CW and ABC superhero shows, right?in a post Nolan world
outdated and cheesy
Yes , for me at least they are so weak I can watch them but I am biased since I am fan of scfi, but as you can tell when super girl was on CBS it was about to get cancel do they saved it by moving it to cw were the audience is more to their liking .Like CW and ABC superhero shows, right? [emoji38]
I realize it may be hard to discuss this new show with so little information being released to the public, but the lack of activity on this thread surprises me. The Barbie Movie thread has more page counts than this does and that thread was started only three days ago. Hmmm, CBS may be correct in their cautious approach to this new series, but I am really looking forward to new Star Trek stories in the prime universe.
4. The idea of a post ds9 story was impossible.
Lost all hope with the PC cast.
PC cast?
Filthy console pleb!Lost all hope with the PC cast.
Enter your email address to join: