Somehow, I find the Death Star wreckage less ridiculous than Darth Maul's return.
Pretty evident that George Lucas lost his fastball a long time ago. And that he fundamentally did not understand the widespread appeal of Darth Maul. Ray Park, Nick Gillard and David Tattersall took what was essentially a blank slate and gave a tension filled contrast to the samurai code. Maul has a visceral feral quality to him. What he does not have, as Lucas desired, was to be a quasi centaur version of Tony Soprano on Coruscant. And especially not for three full sequel films. Want the best proof? If Lucas understood what he had in Darth Maul, he wouldn't have killed him off in the first place. And if he later understood what he had in Darth Maul, he wouldn't have tried to bring him back.
While Kennedy and The Big Mouse carry a major share of the blame for the failures of the Sequel Trilogy, there is also blood on the hands of Lucas. His ability to raze any future film in the national daily media cycle at will operated as a kind of hostage situation for the new Lucasfilm. This is why David Fincher walked out. An actual screen writing method, though completely brutal, is to push through writers block by writing an actual entire novel. Then adapting it into a screenplay. Once you force yourself to long form out the story, you will naturally see the fracture points as you can rarely hide thematic disconnects over volume. People can love, hate or be indifferent to Zahn's trilogy, but at least it was all on paper. At least it had to survive hard vetting by others first from an editing standpoint.
The Prequel Trilogy struggled, in part, because Lucas had rough concepts, stored over decades, without anyone having the power to tell him where his narrative started to disconnect. The same issues would have come up if he had made the decision to helm a Sequel Trilogy as well. Having major falling out situations with Ford Coppola, Brian DePalma and Spielberg didn't help matters.
The core belief that Lucas can tank a future Star Wars project almost completely, just out of spite, by holding his own "Sword Of Damocles" within the framework of the current national daily media cycle, means that a lot of people are basically waiting for him to die. This is an Al Davis / Oakland Raiders situation. Someone who was phenomenal once. In the past. But has clearly lost their fastball. But their waning "legacy" sabotages the current situation. Don't get me wrong, it's not like Kathleen Kennedy and The Big Mouse are blameless here, but it's not just them.
The simple answer is George Lucas is not this mythical endless version of a creative genius. The longer this plays out, the more evident that becomes. I appreciate the Holy Trilogy to no end. But it wasn't just Lucas working on them. He's a rich man's version of Chris Carter.