You watch those films and tell me who is more believable.
Maybe its because I have sons and would do whatever I could to bring them back from darkness. Even die for them. Maybe that is what it touches me.
Anakin's story was not told well. Regardless of how we are supposed to feel.. I did not feel it. He was never likable.
Anakin in his 15 min if being redeemed was far more charismatic and likable as a hero then Anakin ever was.
As a villain.. yeah he sucked at it.. but that was kind of the point of his character.. He could never fully embrace it.
Everything you are saying about Anakin is true.. He should be a great character.. But what is on paper did not translate well at all to the screen.. I am talking PT movies here.. Not his whole arc with the OT.
I would say there is truth to this for sure. A great performance sold me on a character. It made him believable and sympathetic.
Ummmm Cant say that for Hayden.
Ive had the same issues with Vader's redemption.. Ive said before that killing younglings kind of took it too far.. He does all tat and because he.. Wait for it.. Chooses to save his son, He doesn't kill the Emperor to save the galaxy but to save his son. In a way thats still selfish
.. He then gets a free pass.
As for Kylo.. I use to think the same thing after watching TFA. But as the films went on I found myself rooting for his redemption.
Han's death is what cause that path to redemption and I for one would die for my kids if it means their salvation even if I dies at their hands.
So it works for me.
As for all the planet destroying and war crimes they both committed... Well what are you gonna do
If you take a biblical approach then anyone can reach salvation. So I think that is what the films are going for.
but they still should be remembered for the dirt bags they are.