Deckard
Super Freak
But as much as I didn't like Star Trek, the quality of it looked like a major motion picture from a studio.
Not a tv production with a low cgi budget.
Not a tv production with a low cgi budget.
Seriously, can we go back to this morning when I was hyped about this based on rumors as opposed to deflated from seeing one of the worst trailers in history?
Literally nothing for me. Wanted to say the costumes being O.T. look cool but the way they're shot is literally fan fiction quality.
I'm not saying the movie is ****ed, but oh man, between this and that Jurassic World trailer, my excitement levels are running on empty.
The visual quality will be better when it's done, that's for sure. That's how today's cinema works.But as much as I didn't like Star Trek, the quality of it looked like a major motion picture from a studio.
So what you guys are saying is...JJ has performance issues?
Between this and JW, I've read that the CGI sucks, but I would need a point of comparison. What is good use of CGI, either in a trailer or a movie, in the past year or two?
Before watching the trailer I was like
After watching it I was like....
Jesus, a lot of hating going down. I have a couple of overall reservations but I think it's great.
As for the CG. I certainly wasn't blown away by it but neither would I point it out as being particularly bad. The Jurrasoc World trailer however.
And the CG will indeed be a lot better by next Christmas. It's a whole year off release. Thought the tone was pretty exciting and different.
Jesus, a lot of hating going down.
I now remember why I rarely hang out in the Star Wars section of this board. That teaser trailer was ****ing awesome.
Enter your email address to join: