Superman (July 11th, 2025)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I do, I just thought it was a strange response considering everyone is chiming in on the trailer.

If anything seeing a Superdog has just cemented my collection even further.
It's in the comics. So it makes sense. Superman isn't a serious question. But go off I guess.
 
I actually like the broccoli hair. One of the very few instances where I believe people wouldn’t know that this dude is Superman. The contrast between Clark and Superman is pretty nice to see.

SGEUN0H.png

y9NOWmZ.png
Agreed. It's a dorky modern hairstyle and does a great job making him look nothing whatsoever like Superman.

Unlike Cavill’s Clark who absolutely looked 100% like Superman in glasses. 😄
 
None of this makes them look any better in live action.
bro thats YOU. It's fine
They aren't though. They are movies based on comic books. Movies generally look and feel like our world/reality and are much closer to what we experience than a comic book could ever be.
UHHH yes they are COMIC BOOK MOVIES.

I don't understand what you want? It's a man who can fly and has a coloful suit? Synders movies wern't closer to our world or reality either. None of that crap would occur in the real world. His world was just dark and depressing. That's not what the characters are and I don't understand why a colorful upbeat superman is such a problem. I'm not a superman fan but you don;t understand the character if you think that snyders interpretation reflected our real world reality.

Comuc book movies are supposed to be fantasy. Tired of this realistic nonsesne when it comes to men in tights lol
 
Don't you think Batman would be taking steroids?

I wouldn't say you're wrong with most of your points but there are certain limits where it just looks too stupid. For me it's the trunks.
Except that clearly wasn’t what Affleck’s actual body looked like in the movie. Which begs the question, if realism was the intent, why put layered muscles on top of a suit in the first place? And the answer is obvious: because Snyder wanted him to look like his favorite version of the character: Miller’s Dark Knight…which was from a comic book. I guess my point is I don’t see how Superman wearing his trunks is a bridge too far, when the very thing you like so much was, itself, done not in service to realism, but to a comic book. Does that make sense?
 
Surprised to see they're still going with a crystal Fortress. Figured that would have been one of the first things to change. But I guess it's just too good an idea to not use.


View attachment 744819

View attachment 744820
Seems like he isn't wearing any trunks in this scene.. or maybe it's the angle lol.
I'm not liking this suit man, specially the collar part and those unnecessary lines all across his shoulders. Exposed neck would've been so much better with this suit.

Also, Gunn's Lois in this movie is just for "💋"??
 
You ever think maybe they're wearing trunks cause they don't want their weeners sticking out like a ballet dancer?
bro has an S curl and a bright colorful suit but trunks is where things get silly lol. Superman will always look silly and sometimes even batman lol.
 
bro thats YOU. It's fine

UHHH yes they are COMIC BOOK MOVIES.

I don't understand what you want? It's a man who can fly and has a coloful suit? Synders movies wern't closer to our world or reality either. None of that crap would occur in the real world. His world was just dark and depressing. That's not what the characters are and I don't understand why a colorful upbeat superman is such a problem. I'm not a superman fan but you don;t understand the character if you think that snyders interpretation reflected our real world reality.

Comuc book movies are supposed to be fantasy. Tired of this realistic nonsesne when it comes to men in tights lol

Except that clearly wasn’t what Affleck’s actual body looked like in the movie. Which begs the question, if realism was the intent, why put layered muscles on top of a suit in the first place? And the answer is obvious: because Snyder wanted him to look like his favorite version of the character: Miller’s Dark Knight…which was from a comic book. I guess my point is I don’t see how Superman wearing his trunks is a bridge too far, when the very thing you like so much was, itself, done not in service to realism, but to a comic book. Does that make sense?

fellas fellas, imagine this guy coming to beat you up while doing crime.

you would think twice


hFL3RMF.jpeg
 
I swear everyone hated the trunks, then New 52 came along and everyone lambasted them for getting rid of the trunks. Can you say this suit is too busy? Absolutely, but imo adding the trunks is a step in the right direction for comic book movies. I'm tired of the MCU-ification of super suits where everything is some screen printed canvas looking thing. I like the collar look on this Superman, but definitely would like the next appearance of him to have an even more traditional looking costume.
 
Back
Top