Deckard
Super Freak
I'm thinking it will have more to do with Peter's father creating a suit/cure from their Venom.
You could just as easily taken the higher road and countered with the fact that Venom was such a hit, he spawned Ravage, Anti-Venom, etc., all who've had some commercial success in their own right.
Venom literally ****ed Spider-Man in the head? I missed that issue, thankfully.Like he really ****ed with his head but still ..........
Venom literally ****ed Spider-Man in the head? I missed that issue, thankfully.
They need to introduce the Symbiote suit in Sinister Six. Before OSCORP can use it as a weapon, Parker gets a hold of it and uses it to help him defeat the Six but it plays off his emotions over a dead Gwen so he has to get rid of it. Then use it for a Venom movie.
This franchise doesn't seem very concerned with that stuff (several arch enemies are apparently created at Osborne Industries; Norman isn't the first Goblin), and it would be just as well to me so long as they figure out how to tell a good story period.
Venom literally ****ed Spider-Man in the head? I missed that issue, thankfully.
You stated really which constitutes as literally.
Remember, he's a "writer."
Though The Amazing Spider-Man 3 no longer has a release date, there's still clearly a lot going on behind-the-scenes at Sony Pictures when it comes to this character. The ever reliable Badass Digest confirm that they too have heard about plans to possibly incorporate Spider-Man into the Marvel Cinematic Universe (if you missed that story yesterday, more details can be found by clicking here), but that is actually one of THREE different ideas curently being passed around.
The site claims to have been told that, "Sony is going to soft reboot Spider-Man with The Sinister Six, having a new actor playing a Spidey who works with the villains The Dirty Dozen style to take down a larger threat." This actually sounds similar to the Ultimate Six story arc from a few years back and would make sense, though recasting Andrew Garfield when he still has another picture left on his contract doesn't. The other plan? "To put Spider-Man on the shelf for four or five years and see if they can develop any of the side characters into their own franchises." This one seems more likely in some ways, especially as Sinister Six has taken the release date previously held by The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and a female-led spin-off is also in the works.
It's a pretty sad state of affairs when a character like Spidey needs to be benched after two mediocre movies though. The site adds that they're not sure whether all or any of these will come to pass, but changes are definitely in store. Oh, and one more thing for you to mull over; Venom is said to be "functionally dead again," giving everyone who said "It'll never get made!" something to boast about. How do you guys feel about this news? Sound off with your thoughts below.
Read more at Sony May Reboot And Recast SPIDER-MAN With SINISTER SIX; VENOM Movie Reportedly Scrapped
Hope they don't. Garfield is great, they just need to focus more on story and not universe building
Wherever Spidey ends up, I hope Garfield goes along with, like him a lot as an actor, but his version of PP hasn’t been written that great, he makes an awesome Spiderman though and has a lot of potential to bring us the best cinematic Spidey yet.
I think Garfield was good as spidey, but I hated the movies portrayal of Peter Parker. I'm not surprised if they do a soft reboot. Both movies were less than mediocre in my opinion. You have so many really great actors and yet if the writing and direction is poor, the whole movie suffers.
Enter your email address to join: