The Amazing Spider Man 2 (2014)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Just bring back the spectacle again bring back the hardships and struggles ditch this parents bs and let's focus on Peter Parker trying to be a hero. Not a dumb mystery .
 
wow, sony really is desperate :lol:lol

w5ZKHAg.png


Sony Approached Sam Raimi About Returning To Troubled
 
They should fire whoever is in charge. I was all for this franchise when ASM came out I said why not its a fresh new start but ASM2 just ****ed my expectations of this franchise going in a great direction. Yea we had our arguments and yes the movies isnt horrible but when you have ****ing GOTG and Captain america beating a spiderman movie then somthing is wrong...... very wrong.

Nobody wants your aunt may movie, and nobody wants a sinister six movie without spidey. The spidey summit is in jan and i pray they make the right decision and partner up or keep ****ing **** up.
 
I think we're going to get a ton of spinoffs before we get another stand alone Spidey flick, not sure if they plan on soft rebooting or keeping Garfield though.
 
I think the issue with spinoffs is I'm not sure it will work without spidey. Each spinoff of a character, it's first film has to be an origins story. All of them include spiderman. I say do a movie like venom where the character is already established and have a handful of flashbacks showing his origin with just a non-speaking spidey in action. That's the best way imo.
 
They should fire whoever is in charge. I was all for this franchise when ASM came out I said why not its a fresh new start but ASM2 just ****ed my expectations of this franchise going in a great direction. Yea we had our arguments and yes the movies isnt horrible but when you have ****ing GOTG and Captain america beating a spiderman movie then somthing is wrong...... very wrong.

Nobody wants your aunt may movie, and nobody wants a sinister six movie without spidey. The spidey summit is in jan and i pray they make the right decision and partner up or keep ****ing **** up.


I....I want that sinister six movie..
 
I think the issue with spinoffs is I'm not sure it will work without spidey. Each spinoff of a character, it's first film has to be an origins story. All of them include spiderman. I say do a movie like venom where the character is already established and have a handful of flashbacks showing his origin with just a non-speaking spidey in action. That's the best way imo.

Yea, I agree, if they want to do another reboot and quickly build a universe they should copy what WB/DC is doing.
 
I like the ASM series, partially of the mix of Ultimate and Amazing, as well as seeing some of these guys getting their interpretation on the big screen. I think Garfield is fantastic, but I agree he does cry a bit too much. Spidey tends to hold that all together. He is a fantastic Spidey though.

I don't see why Sony has to be so ****ing idiotic about the franchise. It's like they care more about having product placement, than actually have Spidey in the shot.


I want spin offs, but they will only get so ****** without consistency, and time and effort can be placed on something else. Venom, sure I'll watch; Sinister Six, **** yes!; Aunt May, let me stab my eyes out.


Sony should just let it go. Might as well make some profit of the sell back, opposed to continue bombing these movies.
 
All they have to do is write up a story arc over 3 movies. Let the director and writers have free reign as long as they stick to that then stick to the plan and don't listen to fans on the internet and change plans mid way through.

There's a lot of hyperbole about the franchise needing saving and so forth but while ASM2 was disappointing it's no where near the travesty people like to claim it was simply a mediocre movie no moreso or less than lots of others than continue without calls for them to be scrapped or rescued.

Not with proper build up you don't XD

Movies don't need build up. Suicide squad isn't getting one
 
All they have to do is write up a story arc over 3 movies. Let the director and writers have free reign as long as they stick to that then stick to the plan and don't listen to fans on the internet and change plans mid way through.

There's a lot of hyperbole about the franchise needing saving and so forth but while ASM2 was disappointing it's no where near the travesty people like to claim it was simply a mediocre movie no moreso or less than lots of others than continue without calls for them to be scrapped or rescued.

I agree. Get a plan. Stick with it. Pretty straight forward. At first I thought Sony would do just fine with the criticism, but it really seems like they're taking it to heart. And now it just makes things look worse with all of these rumors flying around about MORE reboots, etc. etc.

Garfield can carry this entire franchise and you've got him. Get your act together and put pen to paper. Don't over think this. :lol
 
All they have to do is write up a story arc over 3 movies. Let the director and writers have free reign as long as they stick to that then stick to the plan and don't listen to fans on the internet and change plans mid way through.

There's a lot of hyperbole about the franchise needing saving and so forth but while ASM2 was disappointing it's no where near the travesty people like to claim it was simply a mediocre movie no moreso or less than lots of others than continue without calls for them to be scrapped or rescued.



Movies don't need build up. Suicide squad isn't getting one

I know nova but Suicide squad and sinister six are two completely different things. One can work without the hero and one cant. A sinister six movie without spiderman doesnt make sense and yes these villains need buildup. Doc ock needs it he cant just show up, kraven wouldnt need it, mysterio would he cant just show up. Joker and harley and deaadhot and all these other heros arent in a universe where the hero just started like spidey did.
 
Sony Pictures Hires Kim Jong-Un to Direct, Star in 'Spider-Man 3' | Spencer Green

In a surprising move, Sony Pictures Entertainment has hired North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to direct and star in The Amazing Spider-Man 3, the latest sequel in the movie studio's superhero franchise. "We at Sony are delighted to be working with such a talented, visionary, and handsome person as Kim Jong-un," said Sony spokesbot Millard Cappistonic. "The ideas he will bring to the next Spider-Man are extraordinary and may revolutionize film as we know it. And did we mention that he's handsome?"

According to Hollywood insiders, the story for the next Spider-Man movie -- which will be known as The Amazing Respected Comrade and Supreme Leader Spider-Man -- will involve hero Peter Parker (played by Jong-un) swiftly rising to the position of All-Powerful Commander of the Former United States and then teaming up with Kim Jong-un (played by Jong-un, in a dual role) to destroy their capitalist enemies. "It's certainly a different take on the Spider-Man legend," explains fanboy Roland Wisetully, who read a leaked online version of the script.

(SPOILER ALERT!) Spider-Man kills Gwen Stacy as a traitor "for all ages" because she was planning some kind of coup although that coup is never explained. Also, Spider-Man's costume is really just kind of a military uniform with the word "webs" written on it. And roughly half the script depicts North Korean women weeping and fainting at the sight of Spider-Man while Seth Rogen and James Franco are pistol-whipped. To be honest, it doesn't exactly fit into the Marvel universe, but it does sound better than The Amazing Spider-Man 2.

MORE:

Don’t know how true this is but this is a pretty unique choice.
 
I know nova but Suicide squad and sinister six are two completely different things. One can work without the hero and one cant. A sinister six movie without spiderman doesnt make sense and yes these villains need buildup. Doc ock needs it he cant just show up, kraven wouldnt need it, mysterio would he cant just show up. Joker and harley and deaadhot and all these other heros arent in a universe where the hero just started like spidey did.

I take your point. Well said.

Anyhoo, I hope we get ASM3 with Andrew back. All it needs to be better is a core story and much less sub-plots.

Sony just need realise that they can't have a universe. They went all in and it didn't pay off. They were impetuous so should see that and scale back the plans to develop them over time. They I instead need to focus on making solid solo movies with an arc that continues over several movies like Harry's descent in the Raimi trilogy.

They should take a lesson from Fox. They tried to kick start some X-Men solo movies but after Origins it wasn't gonna work so to instead of continuing or selling the property they refocused and slowly built the franchise back up. They developed First Class then X-Men Days of Future Past to soft-reboot and get things back on track in a big big way.

Sony should keep Spider-Man and draw out a story arc over a new trilogy. Stick to that story arc and don't change things and develop the franchise.

I'd like them to jump ahead a few years with Pete working at the DB and finishing up college and add more supporting characters.

They could do a trilogy around the symbiotes.

Movie 1: Have Pete discovering the costume and introducing Brock and have Pete abandon the costume at the end

Movie 2: Have Brock adopt the costume and become Venom then spawn Carnage at the end.

Movie 3: Have the Carnage Symbiote as a series killer villain with Cassidy and Spider-Man needing to team up with Brock to defeat him.

They could adapt the tons of storylines into a trilogy and simply carry on steadily
 
Last edited:
Back
Top