The Amazing Spider-Man - OPEN SPOILERS NOW
- Thread starter The Mike
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
No, Spidey took it off in the train scene, but only because he couldn't see.
Now, honestly that moment he did NEED the mask off. It's an emotional scene. We needed to see his face there.
No, Spidey took it off in the train scene, but only because he couldn't see.
Now, honestly that moment he did NEED the mask off. It's an emotional scene. We needed to see his face there.
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
[ame]https://youtu.be/GYOYewO_Veg[/ame]
emotional scene ? for kids maybe this scene drives me up the wall
[ame]https://youtu.be/GYOYewO_Veg[/ame]
emotional scene ? for kids maybe this scene drives me up the wall
Nightwing
Super Freak
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2011
- Messages
- 1,018
- Reaction score
- 0
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Technically, he could've took it off, ripped the right eye lens from the mask, and put it back on. That way the audience could see him stressing to stop the train. It would be similar to how Bane shows emotion through his eyes on TDKR.
Or the scene on Spiderman 1 before the bomb blew off half his mask.
Technically, he could've took it off, ripped the right eye lens from the mask, and put it back on. That way the audience could see him stressing to stop the train. It would be similar to how Bane shows emotion through his eyes on TDKR.
Or the scene on Spiderman 1 before the bomb blew off half his mask.
Last edited:
thenammagazine
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
See? You're still making excuses for Garfield's which is even more blatant.
See? You're still making excuses for Garfield's which is even more blatant.
Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
What bugs me is he took it off and a few seconds later the sparks/fire were gone and he could've put it back on
I could've gone a lifetime without seeing his face like it was when he stopped the train, same with the slow motion running scene when he jumps of a building as Peter Parker
What bugs me is he took it off and a few seconds later the sparks/fire were gone and he could've put it back on
I could've gone a lifetime without seeing his face like it was when he stopped the train, same with the slow motion running scene when he jumps of a building as Peter Parker
thenammagazine
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
The lenses were burned and scorched though. So it would've defeated the whole reason he was forced to remove it in the first place. It's not like he took it off for some kid so the kid could see he was Peter Parker.
What bugs me is he took it off and a few seconds later the sparks/fire were gone and he could've put it back on
The lenses were burned and scorched though. So it would've defeated the whole reason he was forced to remove it in the first place. It's not like he took it off for some kid so the kid could see he was Peter Parker.
Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
I wouldn't guess he was Tobey Maguire from just one eye
I wouldn't guess he was Tobey Maguire from just one eye
thenammagazine
Super Freak
Chapter 2099
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2008
- Messages
- 29,762
- Reaction score
- 24
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
More 'real world' viral games to be unveiled soon!
More 'real world' viral games to be unveiled soon!
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Chapter 2099
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2008
- Messages
- 29,762
- Reaction score
- 24
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
^^^ That's me once I figure out where this is going down.
^^^ That's me once I figure out where this is going down.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 15,216
- Reaction score
- 157
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
The very very long 3d trailer before Prometheus was very good but showed way too much of the movie.
The very very long 3d trailer before Prometheus was very good but showed way too much of the movie.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
No, it's so the actor can act.
It's possible to act with it on, but it's harder. It's whatever.
No, it's so the actor can act.
It's possible to act with it on, but it's harder. It's whatever.
TheObsoleteMan
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2005
- Messages
- 9,951
- Reaction score
- 12
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
Vader isn't the best example because he's a very cold, emotionally controlled character. Not seeing his face is actually an advantage to the performance. That's not the case with Spidey which is why in artwork the artists often do that cheat where they change the size of the eyes on the mask to convey emotion which you can't do in live action.
Vader isn't the best example because he's a very cold, emotionally controlled character. Not seeing his face is actually an advantage to the performance. That's not the case with Spidey which is why in artwork the artists often do that cheat where they change the size of the eyes on the mask to convey emotion which you can't do in live action.
Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
This again, we had the same debate way back in this thread.
Actors CAN act with a mask buy using their Voice and body to express themselves.
Hollwood mistakenly believe we want to see the actor when he's cast as a famous MASKED character
Take the train sequence in SM2 for example, his face expressed desperation and struggle againt the strength of trying to stop the train, it was expressive and ugly, if he had his mask on in that scene to express the same emotions he would've thrashed/moved his head to convey the struggle and yelled to convey the desperation, this wold be more expressive that just the face of the actual sequence
Not being able to rely wholy on face acting leaves an actor free to use his whole body for expression, ala Andy Serkis
This again, we had the same debate way back in this thread.
Actors CAN act with a mask buy using their Voice and body to express themselves.
Hollwood mistakenly believe we want to see the actor when he's cast as a famous MASKED character
Take the train sequence in SM2 for example, his face expressed desperation and struggle againt the strength of trying to stop the train, it was expressive and ugly, if he had his mask on in that scene to express the same emotions he would've thrashed/moved his head to convey the struggle and yelled to convey the desperation, this wold be more expressive that just the face of the actual sequence
Not being able to rely wholy on face acting leaves an actor free to use his whole body for expression, ala Andy Serkis
Last edited:
ironwez20
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 27,857
- Reaction score
- 5,882
Re: The Amazing Spider-Man
the carjacker scene in asm is a good example of showing emotion through a mask
This again, we had the same debate way back in this thread.
Actors CAN act with a mask buy using their Voice and body to express themselves.
Hollwood mistakenly believe we want to see the actor when he's cast as a famous MASKED character
Take the train sequence in SM2 for example, his face expressed desperation and struggle againt the strength of trying to stop the train, it was expressive and ugly, if he had his mask on in that scene to express the same emotions he would've thrashed/moved his head to convey the struggle and yelled to convey the desperation, this wold be more expressive that just the face of the actual sequence
Not being able to rely wholy on face acting leaves an actor free to use his whole body for expression, ala Andy Serkis
the carjacker scene in asm is a good example of showing emotion through a mask
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Hot Toys The Dark Knight Joker DX/Artisan 1/6 Scale Figure- Latest: GrimmReapah
-
-
InArt: The Lord of the Rings - Aragorn 1:6
- Latest: Scout Trooper
