I like my Batman. Frank Miller started us down this path. This is why it is now also cool to have "Evil Superman". WB is doing the Injustice animated movie, so more evil Superman. Yeah, everyone needs more evil Superman.
I love Batman it?s just the Snyder cultist and bat fans seem to believe he must always be like that overrated tdkr comic and be a grizzled broken man who is also old but can also beat everyone. It?s boring . Gimme the stealthy detective that has empathy and isn?t some hulking brute who can take on 50 people with ease
Batman is a power fantasy but for a very specific demographic. The lonely little boys who want to revell in their "sadness", but aren't all that edgy.
Overrated? Overrated?? How dare you, sir. Frank Miller's The Dark Knight (not "The Dark Knight Returns"; when it was originally published the overall mini-series was simply called "The Dark Knight" and only the first book was called "The Dark Knight Returns." It's of course retroactively been re-titled "The Dark Knight Returns" since the late 80s) is the greatest American comic book of all time. If it's been referenced and ripped off a million times since then, that doesn't make the original any less amazing.
But Frank went out of his way to show that yes, his Batman was an old man and was indeed very capable of being defeated. Especially by the Mutant Leader.
View attachment 513605
View attachment 513606
View attachment 513607
View attachment 513608
View attachment 513609
View attachment 513610
I like my Batman. Frank Miller started us down this path. This is why it is now also cool to have "Evil Superman". WB is doing the Injustice animated movie, so more evil Superman. Yeah, everyone needs more evil Superman.
Yep, when TDK hits theaters this board was inundated with dark, brooding, wannabe edgy types that previously loved Highlander. Chaos ensued as bright cheery Superman fans were assaulted by dark boys with mean humor. Why So Serious became a rally cry...
Many of those members are still here, but they've softened up a bit as they've aged.
In the 2000s it got ramped up. I remember around the time of No Man's Land that it increased in frequency. I might be wrong and focusing on certain moments, it's been a long time. Look, I still like Batman on some level. There are things I've abandoned and never looked back, but I'm still getting the new DX. Part of that admittedly is that I like Bale a lot, but still. He ticks off several of my boxes as a character and property. But the last two decades were full of people trying to one up each other with more gruesome and "dark" stories, while Batman remained the same exact moralist he was before Miller came along. At some point he stops being a tortured hero stuck in a bad place, and starts being a sadomachocist who places his own holliness above the people he's supposed to be protecting.Well I read all the monthly Batman comics from about 1988 to 2000, and I only remember him actually crying about his parents ONCE.
But apparently Tom King uses Batman as a self-insert so his Batman probably cries on every other page. I wouldn't know cause Tom King is one of the worst "writers" to ever work on Batman so I wouldn't read his **** if you paid me.
Tom King sucks. I hope he's reading this right now. Hey Tom King.....you SUCK.
Eh, I don't know. What's considered "dark" has remained consistent, it's the dichotomy between "kiddie dark" and "adult dark" that gets muddled. The genres kee bleeding into each other. I will agree that kids are exposed to more hardcore stuff from an early age now, so creatives keep pushing the limits into darker and darker territories. But honestly, there was a time the original Grimm Fairy Tales were being read to kids, and now you have 30 YOs discovering and going "zeeeoemgeeee I won't be able to sleep tonight" or some other nonsense.I think its also our collective concept of 'dark' keeps changing. Its relative.
Remember when Batman '89 was considered dark? Yes, that flamboyant cartoon was considered dark and not just because of lighting.
Well I read all the monthly Batman comics from about 1988 to 2000, and I only remember him actually crying about his parents ONCE.
But apparently Tom King uses Batman as a self-insert so his Batman probably cries on every other page. I wouldn't know cause Tom King is one of the worst "writers" to ever work on Batman so I wouldn't read his **** if you paid me.
Tom King sucks. I hope he's reading this right now. Hey Tom King.....you SUCK.
Most of us are old enough to remember everyone freaking out, pre-internet, when Michael Keaton was announced as Batman.
I didn't freak out, but unlike a lot of kids my age, I was already on the Bat-wagon before 1989. I was big into the comics, and I just couldn't imagine Mr. Mom wearing the tights.
Then an article came out in Newsweek which had the first picture I'd see of Keaton all suited up.
Pretty sure it was this famous promotional shot.
View attachment 513516
I was disappointed at first cause the costume was all black and not grey and blue, and that he had clearly fake rubber muscles, but soon like everyone else in the world, I was transfixed and couldn't wait to see the movie and get a cool toy of this new take on Batman. (Still haven't got the perfect figure 32 years later....)
I really liked Batman Begins, but I really didn't care for the costume. But when the sequel was in development, I was already a big fan of Ledger's and I knew he was gonna crush it despite the naysayers. I absolutely loved the first promo reveal.
I didn't automatically trash everything for no reason. I've given every movie Batman a chance. Even Clooney.
This one is different though. This just looks like such low budget, phoned-in CW trash, I can't even pretend to give it a fair shake. That's the ugliest Batman costume I've ever seen. Even TDK armor plates was better than this. And that's definitely the laziest, non-iconic Batmobile ever made.
Ever watch those behind the scenes making of the Batmobiles? Even on the crap movies, the designers all jumped at the chance to try to outdo the last one. This one...is just a black car. That's all. Just a car.
I don't know why all this stuff looks so bad. Is it intentional? Does the director think he's being different by showing a cheap car and a cheap suit? Or does this movie just have no budget?
I think it is exactly intentional. This is year 2..... it?s been one of my greatest joys over the past few years seeing the ?in between? times in the Batman comics.
Seeing a origin story is been done to death, show me Batman before he was the unstoppable hero we know, but after he has had a little seasoning. It?s really the only story left to tell. I also think it?s what made TDK so interesting. We need more of that story.
I am really banking on a possible second costume reveal before the end of this film.
It?s one of the great things about Daredevil on Netflix, seeing him grow and change over time into the hero we know from the comics.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I keep thinking Jye is RIDDICK with that old ben avatar.
I miss Riddick, he was a cunning warrior and a good friend.
I miss Riddick, he was a cunning warrior and a good friend.
Enter your email address to join: