The Dark Knight Rises *SPOILERS*
- Thread starter Goonsack Steve
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Status
- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,882
- Reaction score
- 289
...I just remember the last time they replaced a creative team...and had input...
It will be fine. It's time to move on from Nolan's batman films and let him be a superhero once again.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
ZsaszSays
Super Freak
DreaAlGhul
Super Freak
You know, it really just dawned on me. I mean I knew it, but I guess it hadn't really hit me yet. This is it, it's over.
And the WB Execs are going to be trusted to hand this franchise off to someone else....
Granted, they most likely wont be as amazing as Nolans, but I still think it'll be exciting to see different & hopefully more comic-book accurate (without them being like Schumacher's) films in the future.
Or at least make Batman into more of a freaking detective like he's suppose to be, dammit.
Josh-A-Tron
Super Freak
Batman was never a superhero. He has no superpowers.
We shall See Ms. Al Ghul, We Shall See
Batman was never a superhero. He has no superpowers.
Tony Stark doesn't have super powers and he's considered one. Having powers doesn't make one a superhero. He's always been considered a superhero.
Josh just came and pwned.
Close this thread.
That's how I roll.
Well, I didn't think Nolan's films were amazing so I can't say I agree with that. I'll be very curious to see if the Nolanites will give future batman films a fair chance.
Josh-A-Tron
Super Freak
I loved these films, however, I'm a Batman first. So watching more Batman has never been a problem for me but I also hold the films about Batman to a certain standard and while I don't think anyone has been "faithful" to the comics completely I think Nolan's movies had more of the essence of the character in mind than the previous films did.
And all the 89' lovers can bash me all they want but unless we're talking 30's/40's Batman he does not kill, it's the one thing about the first of film I couldn't take.
ZsaszSays
Super Freak
Darn ya got me. How can I debate with that definition?
The comic world considers batman and tony stark to be superheroes despite them not having powers like super man or Thor.
Josh-A-Tron
Super Freak
Um, how do you figure it takes place in the 40's?
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2008
- Messages
- 32,452
- Reaction score
- 3,160
ZsaszSays
Super Freak
Darn ya got me. How can I debate with that definition?
The comic world considers batman and tony stark to be superheroes despite them not having powers like super man or Thor.
Funny thing about them too....they're not superheroes either. They're technically aliens. The come from planets that have others with the same powers and/or abilities as them. Just a couple holes in the comic world huh?
Nolan's Batman killed, too. He was directly responsible for the deaths of lots of League of Shadows guys in BB, arguably R'as Al Ghul, Two-Face, and Tahlia. Hell, he even drove the Tumbler over a car filled with cops, which could/should have crushed them. His "one rule" in the films is just expository lip service.
Josh-A-Tron
Super Freak
It's no secret that Burton mixed era's with the film especially stylistically but it doesn't indicate that the film takes place in any one era. The point of him having cars from the 70's and 80's, Weapons form the 40's 50's and 60's, not to mention color monitors, video camera's, VCR's and other obvious technologies is so the audience can't truly place dates on the film. It's a constant mix and match. Saying that's it's 40's Batman wouldn't go with the eclectic mixture the composition of the film tries to give.
ZsaszSays
Super Freak
The hole point of the Batman universe since the beginning of the comics was that there was no set time era. That was supposed to be irrelevant.
Funny thing about them too....they're not superheroes either. They're technically aliens. The come from planets that have others with the same powers and/or abilities as them. Just a couple holes in the comic world huh?
Yup
- Status
