TheProcrastinator
Super Freak
What makes you think I'd want to taint the Avengers thread with your misguided musings? I'm leaving your posts right here.
That's okay. I'll claim the moral victory then.
The Dark Knight Rises *SPOILERS*
- Thread starter Goonsack Steve
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Status
That's okay. I'll claim the moral victory then.
thenammagazine
Super Freak
I don't even need to. Not because I don't want to, but because Khev spelled it out for you. Granted, he didn't break it down into single-syllable words, but if you didn't get it from his reply, you're clearly "
" and refusing to even see things outside of the narrow scope of your tunnel vision. It's like trying to tell a high crackhead that drugs are bad. 
jye4ever
Broke and happy
And so battle # 44,128 begins. 
TheProcrastinator
Super Freak
I don't even need to. Not because I don't want to, but because Khev spelled it out for you. Granted, he didn't break it down into single-syllable words, but if you didn't get it from his reply, you're clearly "
Dude, seriously. What is wrong with you? Were you bullied as a child? Tell me. Make yourself comfortable on the couch and let it flow. I am listening.
I am honestly astounded by how easily and naturally you are able warp every civil discussion to fit you twisted view.
How am I an "ignorant" for countering Khev's interpretation with arguments? Khev's point of view was not a collection of hard facts about the movie, but an interpretation just as opinionated as mine, and yet somehow he's got the monopol for truth, and everyone who provides arguments against it, is automaticaly ignorant in your twisted worldview? Actually his posts were more opinionated than mine, couse at least I was able to quote parts of the film, that explicitly countered his view.
Explain to me how this works. If Khev writes: "the team didn't believe Loki got an army", and I reference an actual quote from the movie, where Thor, ****ing explains verbatim to everyone that Loki truly has an army, then I am the ignorant here? Seriously explain this to me like to a dumb child, couse I am truly fascinated by how the cogs of your mind work, and how do you get to your twisted conclusions. How do You justify all this, to yourself. No, seriously I want to learn about you, study you. Consider me fascinated and hooked by this point.
Even if we were to say that I am wrong, for the sake of this post, then just fact that I am able to provide some arguments, that are not pulled out of my ass, but taken from the movie, then it would at least show that the discussion is warranted, and wouldn't immediately paint me as an ignorat.
It's ironic that the biggest troll on this board is actually styling himself, as an antidote to all internet drama. Perhaps you dont even realise that you are a MODEL, textbook example of an skilled internet troll. There should be a wikipedia entry, with a database of your posts. It's not even that you're rude or annoying (after all, sometimes one has to skip the netiquette in order to ram the point in), its that you are talking out of your ass, twisting people intentions and generally warping the whole discussion. You call others ignorants or trolls, but its you who is probably the most deaf-to-arguments user on this board.
Your sig says "I have a smart-ass attidue". No. You are not a smart ass. Cynicism and arrogance has to be earned. When you are being snarky and barbed, and acting like a cheeky wise guy, then you better have some good arguments to back that attitude up, otherwise you are just going to make yourself look pathetic, not sarcastic. I honestly hope that this is simply nothing more than your internet tough guy persona. Couse if You're really that illogical and annyoing in real...well, lets just say life's gonna be hard dude. I am truly amazed that anyone on this board, still takes You seriously.
Ha. I am actually looking forward to your reply to this. I am sure its going to be gloriously full of s**t.
Last edited:
thenammagazine
Super Freak
^^^ Wassamatter? Did I hurt your feelings? Awwwe.
Fact is, you've denied THE explanations for what you've found wrong with the film, hanging on by a thread to some fictional flaw you found with the movie so you could troll it in the TDKR thread because you know damn well you'd get railed for it's absurdity in the Avengers thread.
Fact is, you've denied THE explanations for what you've found wrong with the film, hanging on by a thread to some fictional flaw you found with the movie so you could troll it in the TDKR thread because you know damn well you'd get railed for it's absurdity in the Avengers thread.
I actually said "apparently Stark didn't fully believe it" based on his comments to Loki "MAYBE you'd got an army and MAYBE they're too much for us," "right, army," "seeing, still working on believing," and so on. I never said the whole team. The only time the "team" was debriefed as a unified unit they were being effed with by Loki's spear. Once that was removed from their midst they got their act together and went off to stop whatever he was going to do with the tesseract. Didn't really seem contrived at all but you obviously disagree so there you go.
thenammagazine
Super Freak
It's pointless. To acknowledge what you've been posting means he'd have to acknowledge the fact that the contents of his long-winded trolling posts are fabricated.
TheProcrastinator
Super Freak
No, this is what You said:
I can clearly see a "they" not "only Stark" in the above sentance.
You can say it now, that You only meant Stark, and it still doesn't change the fact that they all knew about the army, they were warned about it by one of their own, who is a brother to Loki, and even if still somehow some of them didn't fully believe it, they had to take it seriously given what was at stake here. I never negated the effects of Loki's spear. Loki was just further exploiting the flaw of Avengers being a violate, incompatible mix that needs the right "push" to work, which is a theme that Whedon is feeding to us, throughout the whole movie. If Loki's spear was the only thing that prevented them from working properly, then why bother with the whole plot of Coulsons death as a catalyst at all? Why Stark's forced speech about the real nature of the name "Avengers"? Why Fury's ploy with the "push"? Why Coulsons pre-death comment explicitly referencing the whole point of Avengers needing a singular fix.
I don't even think this is any serious flaw of the film (as I said before), so Nam can go suck it with the whole "troll the avengers in TDKR thread". I loved the movie, and as I've allready written I know why Whedon had to do it and I am glad that he did, tough I am done repeating this, couse apparently Nam is too thick-headed to absorb it. I just defended Fernadofan, who some of You jumped despite the fact that a - he got a point, and b - he clearly wasn't the only one who though that, since coulsons death is often brought up. And then You pointed what You thought were flaws in my reasoning, and I replied to You, and here we are...
No. You just annoyed me. Couse I got to hand it to you. That you can do well.
I can clearly see a "they" not "only Stark" in the above sentance.
You can say it now, that You only meant Stark, and it still doesn't change the fact that they all knew about the army, they were warned about it by one of their own, who is a brother to Loki, and even if still somehow some of them didn't fully believe it, they had to take it seriously given what was at stake here. I never negated the effects of Loki's spear. Loki was just further exploiting the flaw of Avengers being a violate, incompatible mix that needs the right "push" to work, which is a theme that Whedon is feeding to us, throughout the whole movie. If Loki's spear was the only thing that prevented them from working properly, then why bother with the whole plot of Coulsons death as a catalyst at all? Why Stark's forced speech about the real nature of the name "Avengers"? Why Fury's ploy with the "push"? Why Coulsons pre-death comment explicitly referencing the whole point of Avengers needing a singular fix.
I don't even think this is any serious flaw of the film (as I said before), so Nam can go suck it with the whole "troll the avengers in TDKR thread". I loved the movie, and as I've allready written I know why Whedon had to do it and I am glad that he did, tough I am done repeating this, couse apparently Nam is too thick-headed to absorb it. I just defended Fernadofan, who some of You jumped despite the fact that a - he got a point, and b - he clearly wasn't the only one who though that, since coulsons death is often brought up. And then You pointed what You thought were flaws in my reasoning, and I replied to You, and here we are...
^^^ Wassamatter? Did I hurt your feelings? Awwwe.
No. You just annoyed me. Couse I got to hand it to you. That you can do well.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
ironwez20
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 28,360
- Reaction score
- 6,402
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rooH4KHYXgk
I couldn't find it, but I know what you're talking about.
Lol awesome!!!
thenammagazine
Super Freak
ironwez20
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 28,360
- Reaction score
- 6,402
Yup, just like you, he can't spell "ignorant."
Lol typical I agree to a post against you and get a smartass reply lol.
thenammagazine
Super Freak
The only reason you agreed with it is because you always get the ass end of our little spats.
I still love ya though, bunky. 
Besides, it's not like what I posted wasn't true.
ironwez20
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 28,360
- Reaction score
- 6,402
The only reason you agreed with it is because you always get the ass end of our little spats.
Aww love ya to buddy. Lol
jye4ever
Broke and happy
I just enjoy watching members getting frustrated from Nam or DiFabio.
Even when they're both wrong, they win.
Only voidact is impervious.
Even when they're both wrong, they win.
Only voidact is impervious.
Last edited:
TheProcrastinator
Super Freak
Why, becouse he supposedly makes us all worked up for nothing?
Dude, I am fine and dandy. His agitating, totaly-missing-the-point posts, have left me with nothing but a mild annyonce (I am not on Void's level yet). Writing a post takes me just a minute, and requires no physical exertion. I've said my piece and I am fine. Just another opinion on why he's an ass. An ass who's constantly wrong too, depite his high and mighty attitude.
jye4ever
Broke and happy
You seem like a smart person, able to articulate your thoughts in a well layered and structured manner.
But to call and lable someone you don't even know those things over a movie discussion is just silly.
Some will favor with you and some with Nam, chill yo.
thenammagazine
Super Freak
You seem like a smart person, able to articulate your thoughts in a well layered and structured manner.
But to call and lable someone you don't even know those things over a movie discussion is just silly.
Some will favor with you and some with Nam, chill yo.
It's because he doesn't like being knocked off his selfricheous pedestal. He turns into a puffy chicken and creates longwinded posts of nothing but "BOK! BOK! BGAWK!"
- Status
