greygoose
Super Freak
Dave posted his comment in there also.
Cheers Snoop! Progress!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0760/d0760e1b03d214dd85f5846e740cbfa33d2ce4c4" alt="Duff :duff :duff"
Dave posted his comment in there also.
So Year One first then?...
Cheers dude! DKR as a starting point?
Cheers dude! DKR as a starting point?
I would suggest going in order of Batman's career, so Year One.
I agree with Snake. I'd start with Year One.
DKR is a well-told story, but I think it's been worshipped on a level that's undeserved. Miller really started going crazy with the sequels though.
Year One established a new continuity for Batman post-COIE, and DKR is basically the perfect end to the Batman story (do not, ever, read the two sequels to it) that also fits into Year One's continuity. That said, I suggest reading the 70's O'Neil/Adams run on the main comic first - not only do they represent some of the best pre-COIE DC comics (at least in my opinion), but it's also when Batman first took a turn for the darker, and a lot of comics since subtly pay their dues to those old issues.
This is just my red-hot opinion and others are welcome to disagree, but the majority of American comics just aren't worth reading. Most characters have maybe three or four really good runs over the course of their existence and a couple of standout, character-defining storylines. The rest is just so much filler.
Year One established a new continuity for Batman post-COIE, and DKR is basically the perfect end to the Batman story (do not, ever, read the two sequels to it) that also fits into Year One's continuity. That said, I suggest reading the 70's O'Neil/Adams run on the main comic first - not only do they represent some of the best pre-COIE DC comics (at least in my opinion), but it's also when Batman first took a turn for the darker, and a lot of comics since subtly pay their dues to those old issues.
This is just my red-hot opinion and others are welcome to disagree, but the majority of American comics just aren't worth reading. Most characters have maybe three or four really good runs over the course of their existence and a couple of standout, character-defining storylines. The rest is just so much filler.
I've been reading way more independent titles over the years. They are still trying to tell original stories. Marvel and DC are really just doing constant reboots to sell books with #1 on them since people buy those more than anything.
Agreed. Aren't they mostly tanking in sales?
You're absolutely right about there being a small window of actual good stories to go by on any particular character. As much as I love Wolverine, he's got a lot of **** one offs and miniseries garbage.
That speaks with color alone. I need to get around to reading the Dredd comics.
Dredd's a pretty fantastic ride from start to present. It's really interesting watching the character age in real time, that's definitely something you don't get with American comics. It also adds a hell of a lot of tension to the newer stories, as you're constantly wondering how much longer this 70+ year-old man, past his prime and riddled with cancer, can go on for...
That image above is from a comic called The Incal, by Chilean filmmaker Alejandro Jodorowsky and French artist Jean 'Moebius' Giraud. I can't recommend the comics in the 'Jodoverse' enough, The Metabarons especially is an incredible story from start to finish.
In the new Dredd comic they just sent him into the future instead of aging him.
**I should specify that this is in the IDW monthly comic.
wtf is this
![]()