The Random Hot Chicks (or Hot Guys) Thread
- Thread starter Darth_Fatso
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Status
jimjimmyjones85
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 20,389
- Reaction score
- 127
Havok
Super Freak
MarfMaster
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2009
- Messages
- 13,329
- Reaction score
- 40
I love that all your models are real women with curves, Havok 
Now then... I guess since I'm at work I'm going to the restroom...
I hope you don't work in the food industry.
da ____????????
Havok
Super Freak
blakus939
Super Freak
This thread has turned to pure epic win, although a question, if I may pose one.
Am I the only one who is becoming persistently annoyed beyond recognition at the amount of tramp stamped, pink-inked sluzza's around these days? Not in this thread, but in general?
I mean, I remember the days - not so long ago in fact - when the only chicks who boasted sleeve-long and extensive tats were those awesome nostalgia, tasteful circa 40's style gals. And it was cool. And it was super hot. Because, however, it was out of the ordinary and so clashingly, yet tastefully mixed with class and crass. Most importantly, they all had a very natural flair.
Now though, it's become crass, ass and trash. Every second silicone bolt-on bimbo has them sprawled all over, in every which direction, expecting to steal the show? Pu.lease! It just screams 'I am a moron. I will do anything to fit in'.
I just don't get it. Especially when they hitch onto the pin up thing too. It's like 'watch me shoot a V for victory with my legs while wearing handerchief shorts and dressed nipples, but because I have a sailor hat on, I'm nostalgia and it's totally okie doke'.
I mean I still dig it, but I don't get it. They've totally ruined it.
It was a pretty good hot/classy/leave something to the imagination nostalgia thing that we once had going I guess.
Am I the only one who is becoming persistently annoyed beyond recognition at the amount of tramp stamped, pink-inked sluzza's around these days? Not in this thread, but in general?
I mean, I remember the days - not so long ago in fact - when the only chicks who boasted sleeve-long and extensive tats were those awesome nostalgia, tasteful circa 40's style gals. And it was cool. And it was super hot. Because, however, it was out of the ordinary and so clashingly, yet tastefully mixed with class and crass. Most importantly, they all had a very natural flair.
Now though, it's become crass, ass and trash. Every second silicone bolt-on bimbo has them sprawled all over, in every which direction, expecting to steal the show? Pu.lease! It just screams 'I am a moron. I will do anything to fit in'.
I just don't get it. Especially when they hitch onto the pin up thing too. It's like 'watch me shoot a V for victory with my legs while wearing handerchief shorts and dressed nipples, but because I have a sailor hat on, I'm nostalgia and it's totally okie doke'.
I mean I still dig it, but I don't get it. They've totally ruined it.
It was a pretty good hot/classy/leave something to the imagination nostalgia thing that we once had going I guess.
Tattoos in moderation can be quite appealing on women particularly on certain areas like the thigh or hips or something. I don't mind the lower back ones either but I just don't think women can get away with sleeve-longs and the extensive tattooing the way men can. For me it just goes against what is supposed to be. But to each their own.
quadcent
Super Freak
agreed, even though i don't have any paint, women with it in moderation can be very sexy, but to much is just a turn off for me.
Tattoos for Tattoos sake does not appeal. Tattoos for the sake of drawing the eye to an attractive and alluring area are cool by me. Hence my like of thigh, hip or lower back tattoos. In those cases I likely couldn't even tell you what the tattoo was though because its just not about the tattoo for me. Obviously it most certainly is about the tattoo for the hardcore enthusiasts and Tattoo artists themselves.
^^^
we can agree to disagree then. The chicks that turn me off are the ones with tats that aren't unique at all. Just go to a beach , and most of those chicks with the tramp stamps all look the same, just random tribal crap. Although I don't prefer women with complete arm sleeves; I still find beauty in what a chick like Renee has because not only is the color beautiful, but so are the designs itself .
The only spots where I hate tats to be on a women is right above her ****s or her face or on the front/sides of her neck. Chicks that gets tats just to be "cool" have the same look and aren't unique at all. My 2 cents......
we can agree to disagree then. The chicks that turn me off are the ones with tats that aren't unique at all. Just go to a beach , and most of those chicks with the tramp stamps all look the same, just random tribal crap. Although I don't prefer women with complete arm sleeves; I still find beauty in what a chick like Renee has because not only is the color beautiful, but so are the designs itself .
The only spots where I hate tats to be on a women is right above her ****s or her face or on the front/sides of her neck. Chicks that gets tats just to be "cool" have the same look and aren't unique at all. My 2 cents......
Havok
Super Freak
I don't mind a tattoo here and there on a woman especially if the design is beautiful but too many and yeah it can turn me off.
Anyway back to the pictures.
Anyway back to the pictures.
THE MIKE's new sig:
Don't know who it is, but wow.
Minka Kelly.
- Status
Similar threads
