The Thing (2011)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
they should've stuck with the practical effects on this one, and just use CGI for the transformations if they needed to.
They initially used the old techniques in combination with CG but then "big studio" has decided to delve into more CG.​

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2bsXC-uhXQ&feature=player_embedded[/ame]

Also I hate the very final Sander-Monster - its appearance and behavior were just arch-idiotic.​
 
CG ruined the magic because of which I'm still fear to watch Carpenter's film.
Monsters were too monotonous and uninventive.
The plot is full of logical inconsistencies with the original.

Imo decent movie and that's all.
It was trying to be different but in the end feels too much like a remake.

I just saw this for the first time last weekend. I liked it, but I agree the CG ruined it, but that can be said for most monster movies now adays. Studios are too lazy to go with what looks more real. The original is way better. I also didn't like that they added those smaller "Things" to this movie that the first movie never had, it made things a little more confusing after watching the original.
 
Would the guy's head from the first one be considered a small thing?

Yep.
And I was quite satisfied with this "lil part" of the new movie - it created half of the sense from the original "blood samples" scene.
 
Last edited:
CGI definitely takes you out of the movie when it gets out of control.

This is why I love "Underworld" series - everything is kept in ideal proportions there.

In case of "The Thing" cg isn't needed almost at all since there're very few monsters that appears pretty quickly (blurry) and fragmentary.
 
The “THING” prequel, doesn’t answer everything.

The Thing prequel did a pretty good job of explaining everything that happened at the Norwegian Camp before the infected dog reached the American camp in John Carpenter’s version (there was an original The Thing back in the day), but they left out one thing. When the American team in Carpenter’s version went to the Alien crash site, saw the Alien ship, saw the block cut out of the ice (the same block they found in the destroyed Norwegian camp); why didn’t the find any snow cats or Kate’s frozen body? In the prequel they must have know people where going to be wondering so why didn’t they finish the movie with an explanation of that?
 
Re: The “THING” prequel, doesn’t answer everything.

Kate drove off, presumably to the nearest camp she know of which was (if I remember correctly) a Russian station!?

As for the remaining snow cat, it was hidden from view (on the opposite side of the UFO where Mac and crew were at) behind the ice/tunnel opening the Norwegians made.
 
Re: The “THING” prequel, doesn’t answer everything.

Then if the Russian camp was only 50 miles away and that’s where the Carter Alien wanted to go, why did the dog alien run to the American camp. Was that some type of "Better way to spread the virus thing" we were suppose to come up with on our (the viewers) own?

And if Kate went on to the Russian camp, aren’t we due for a sequel now?
 
Re: The “THING” prequel, doesn’t answer everything.

The dog alien didn't run to the American camp, it just ran away from the Norwegians attacking and it eventually ended up there. When the nearest camp is mentioned no one ever gives specific directions on how to get there. So the dog-thing was just trying to escape.

As far as a sequel, doubt it. That movie bombed and took a loss.
 
Re: The “THING” prequel, doesn’t answer everything.

I think we would have been better off if Carpenter's idea of a Sci Fi Channel four-hour mini-series sequel to the film in 2003 had been done.
 
Carpenter's Thing: perhaps the most terrifying movie monster ever, right up there with Cameron's Queen xenomorph..... oh my god, a nightmare made [special-effects] flesh. In fact I think the Thing was even scarier than the Queen, because it was all so.... plausible. If we ever make alien contact, that's probably what we'll get: something like that.

2011 remake has a few bad flaws.

1. We just haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaave to have a chick in there, no plot device is too out-there to get a cute little chickie up in that research station. I am honestly amazed they didnt manage to get her into a bikini at some point. Carpenter's version was way more realistic. A bunch of guys, yep, that's what you'd see.

2. Are these scientists related in any way to those boneheads in Prometheus who go down into the Mound, look around, and say "yeah, I think its safe, let's all take off our helmets!"....? Are they blood brothers? They must be.... because drilling down into alien tissue and waving the sample around without so much as one test to make sure the tissue is actually inert [dead], as well as not carrying any potentially problematic microbes is just as bleeping stupid.

3. Ok, I could overlook all that - I have overlooked larger, stupider plot-holes if I am enjoying myself - but when they went inside the alien ship was just shark-jumping time IMO. Anyone coming out of that just does not strike me as plausible.
 
Back
Top