They're at It Again...

[Ryanfromindiana]

It looks like they may have fixed the lazy eye issue on the recast... lol.

 

[roguebaron]

What a horrid waste of Money. If their goal was to titilate, they've failed horribly, their rogue looks like a man in drag. Thy may have fixed the lazy eyes, but I'd be more worried about other things being lazy.

 

[Too Much Garlic]

It's lazy work, looks stupid, but it sells.

It's catering to a big ****s fetish, not to belittle women.

 

[BuffyGirl]

That's unnecassary. People have different tastes. Some people like butts and big ****s. As long as you don't hurt anyone to get off, who cares?

To put it into perspective, for some people, doing it any other way than missionary style is perverted and will get you sent to Hell. They get so mad about something as innocent as doggy style. Not sure what they would say about bunch of people who are fans of a chick who has sex with animated corpses, A.K.A. vampires.

God knows what they would think of what I'm into...

Guess I was thinking more along the lines of statue vs. real human.

Anyways...moving on. I am sure they will have no issues in selling this.

 

[Anzik]

I don't understand getting excited by a statue, but what perplexes me is that if you're willing to go that far, making her pantsless with mammoth jugs why did they bother covering her nipples? Its like eating an entire chocolate cake with a diet coke.

 

[sueworld]

Oh this lot always do that. They call them 'modesty covers' and are just used for the photos The actual statue is always meant to be shown in the nude god help us.

I'm sure Sideshow would freak out If they saw what they've done.

their rogue looks like a man in drag

Oh lord have they done her too? I can't seem to find her on there.

 

[risingstar]

I don't understand getting excited by a statue, but what perplexes me is that if you're willing to go that far, making her pantsless with mammoth jugs why did they bother covering her nipples? Its like eating an entire chocolate cake with a diet coke.

There's a multi billion dollar industry which caters to those who like the tease factor in their statues and collectibles. It's the imagination specifically that's key here. Many of those anime-type female figurines are almost always scantally clad. It may not be for everyone, but there's no questioning that existing market. However, there's no mistaking the flagrant recasting and copyright infringement. That's the central issue, at least for me. However, people are free to like those types of figurines.

 

[risingstar]

Oh this lot always do that. They call them 'modesty covers' and are just used for the photos The actual statue is always meant to be shown in the nude god help us.

I'm sure Sideshow would freak out If they saw what they've done.




Oh lord have they done her too? I can't seem to find her on there.

The Anna Paquin Rogue.

 

[sueworld]

The Anna Paquin Rogue.

I have no idea who/what that is I'm afraid.

That's the central issue, at least for me. However, people are free to like those types of figurines.

Oh yes, just as I'm free to take the piss outta these grotesque parodies of their characters.

 

[Anzik]

Next thing you know they'll make the Willow sculpt look like an uncharacteristic floozie.. oh wait...

 

[sueworld]

Next thing you know they'll make the Willow sculpt look like an uncharacteristic floozie.. oh wait...

*snerk*

 

[Star Puffs]

Its like eating an entire chocolate cake with a diet coke.

Genuine lol comment. Nice simile!

 

[sueworld]

Soooooooooo, would anyone admit to wanting to buy one of these 'souped up' statues?