- Joined
- May 31, 2011
- Messages
- 19,882
- Reaction score
- 289
Oh ****, now you gone done angered him! I'm not sure what's awaiting in his next magnificent reply...
Oh ****, now you gone done angered him! I'm not sure what's awaiting in his next magnificent reply...
what exactly do you do to make ends meet?
I'm a moron and a narcissist. I can't shut up about myself because I'm so smart, and need to elaborate on my intelligence on a dolly forum.
You're forgetting he's an edgelord who binges rick and morty, the word of christ.
in other words
disability checks
Everyone here needs to understand something:
I'm a moral and existential nihilist, not an epistemological nihilist. I'm an empiricist. There is no empirical evidence to suggest that value exists. Again, you serve clients. You are a servant. There's nothing wrong with servitude, but it is what it is. I wasn't born with money, so I had to hustle. I was forced into servitude for a long time. Couldn't escape it until my mid-30's. If I projected value onto circumstances that made me unhappy, I never would have worked to secure freedom.
Again, if you want to serve others, have at it. But it is, what it is. I'd rather live in a world where servitude wasn't an integral part of the economy, but ironically, it's the servants themselves who legitimize it. So I work with what I have, because I'm a realist.
Be more specific! I love GG Allin's live performance. He ***** people. It's interesting. Look at it this way: Would you show up to a concert to watch a guy who ***** members (male and female) of his audience? No? Why not? If people show up to a venue where they know they might get *****, they pay to get in, then they get *****, your thoughts? I think it's hilarious.
You haven't given an example of intrinsic value or worth. You've given examples of symmetry, subjective aesthetics and culture. The rules of harmony are frequently broken by jazz musicians.
You're not getting it. There's a difference between epistemology and existentialism. Look it up. I'm not denying geometry. I'm denying the existence of worth, as "importance". Aesthetics are subjective in terms of desirability. There's no obligation to obey aesthetic theory in terms of what is "desirable", so that's a poor example of value. Value doesn't exist. Symmetry exists, but that has nothing to do with value, as "worth".
Another way of looking at it: Why does science refrain from addressing value? Because there's no falsifiable evidence to suggest value exists. If it exists, it's apriori.
This is what I picture happening in this thread but without the girl present.
Enter your email address to join: