You need to watch Superman 3 and Batman Forever back to back. There is no way you truly think that.
The only interesting thing about Superman 3 is where Clark Kent and Evil Superman fight each other in that junk yard or whatever. You really think Forever has anything in it as bad as that Atari styled game where a computer Superman is dodging those missiles?
Yeah, Riddler and Two-Face are zany and over the top, but that's the world of comic books. If you think bores like Richard Pryor (a bore in the movie anyway,
not a bore with his raunchy stand up) or Robert Vaughn as "Ross Webster". I mean, isn't Superman 3 the one where Clark Kent goes back to Kansas for his high school reunion? C'mon Wor.
Yeah, Batman Forever has a lot of cringey **** in it, but you said it yourself, it has a lot of good too. Off the top of my head, you got that great Batman-y suit up sequence that cuts out the crap and gives the audience what they want, Batman jumping in the Batmobile and going on a mission to fight crime. You got the bank action sequence with the acid vault and the Statue of Liberty. You got the bomb and the circus. You got a good telling of Robin's origin story. You have the hotel sequence where they trap Batman and set him on fire before Robin pulls him out. You have the Batcave going to hell. You have the end at claw island.
The visuals, cinemtagprhy and soundtrack alone are in a completely different playing field than anything in Superman 3. You diss the "prettier colors", but that's part of the appeal about a lot of these comic book movies. Taking the character and their environment (Batman = blue, Riddler = Green, Two-Face = Purple, Robin = Red) and making that part of the marketing campaign was a thing long before the Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, Ragnorok or Justice League. What color palettes does Superman 3 even have?
You're a huge Star Wars nerd, surely you can understand how something as simple as colors can tick all the right boxes for you. Good = white, Bad = black, colorful droids, red and blue lightsabers, yellow text on black star fields hell, I've seen you get passionate about Darth Vader's control box buttons on his chest! Yeah, the Schumacher flicks were made to sell toys, but then again, so was/is Star Wars.
By all accounts Batman Forever exceeded in what it set out to do. I mean, it's definitely not one of my favorite movie or anything, but I don't think it's nearly as bad as people make it out to be. It was a fun flick. Yeah, I did like it when I was a young, naive, boy. If I was a 50 year old dude in 1995, yeah, I probably wouldn't have liked it. But then again, I probably wouldn't like Star Wars, Indiana Jones, 007, superheroes or Batman in general.
Name a perfect movie without anything wrong with it and I'll have Clown Prince tear it apart!
Batman Forever is actually a live action film that, unlike the computer animated Justice League, actually has living, breathing actors and full hand made sets. Diss on Jones and Carrey all you want for being too over the top for your tastes, but surely you can admit they did more work and put themselves into their roles than some intern putting in some downloaded textures on Steppenwolf's face (a character model that wouldn't look too out of place in a 1990s movie ironically enough). Forever is a much better made film and was certainly more successful in what Warner Bros. was seeking with a tent pole movie at the time. Yeah, the Batmobile drove up a wall, atleast they didn't waste millions of dollars editing an actor's mustache off in post. Justice League is just insulting, especially with how much time it was in development. No comparison.