Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Wow. Devin at CHUD has a perfect record of completely 100% disagreeing with me on every level.

I had no expectations for this film at all. The trailer promised another visual extravaganza from Burton but light on story and character like ALL his films, every single one. I figured it might be a mild distraction like Chocolate Factory - beautiful to look at but a failure on the narrative level. So I was not going in with any preconceived expectation of awesomeness of a diehard Burton fan. But I have to say that I think this is most likely my favorite film of his EVER.

I do have to admit that everything is better in digital 3D, and that does add a dimension (pun intended) to the movie going experience that isn't present with flat films. But the sights and sounds (great score by Elfman) of the film drew me in, and for the first time I was truly drawn in by a Burton character. Alice has a very defined character arc, simplistic as it may be, it's definitely there and infinitely relatable, not only for young women, but for everyone. She very much follows the traditional Campbell Hero's Journey, but there's nothing wrong with that. And Depp is heartbreaking, funny, brave and wacky in a character called inconsistent because he is actually, truly at least half-mad (crazy mad, as in mentally instable). And we get to see the event that unhinged him - again, it's a simplistic character beat, but Tarrant (the Hatter's true name), is someone we can identify with and sympathize with completely. Depp goes in and out of madness and in and out of a Scots accent, but you can see the work he's doing and the real thought that lies behind the characterization. His Highlander homage near the end is also a great moment.

In fact many of the characters have a depth that is far beyond a Disney "kid's" film or a Burton film. Glover's evil Knave of Hearts, Hathaway's White Queen - even the little Dormouse are distinct characters that we can hate or care about. Bonham-Carter's Red Queen is even a tad sympathetic, made human by her hidden frustration at not being lovable like her sister and settling for ruling by fear.

I think much of the bad reviews may be centered on expectations. The original story of Alice in Wonderland is full of childish whimsy, a story for small children that is designed to amuse and nothing more. This film is a sequel to the original Alice and Through the Looking Glass and where the older stories were for kids, this story is not really aimed at that audience. It is much, much darker and deals with more adult themes (adult as in complex, not as in sexual) and is about a young woman finding out that she may or may not have a destiny.

Not only is it very dark, it is an adventure story and not a comedy as some might be expecting. There are some funny moments, but this isn't a traditional children's film that may build up the tension to then cut it with a laugh. I definitely wouldn't recommend it for anyone under 10 and I think they'd need to be 13-14 to really appreciate it. However the 3 or 4 year old in row I was in, seemed entranced by it and didn't fidget or complain. He seemed completely engaged and asked occasional questions about the characters on screen.

There is one misstep and I think it's a colossal one - the Fudwacket(?) breakdance seems completely out of place and unnecessary, both from Tarrant and later it's echo with Alice. It takes one out of the film so completely, it could definitely leave a bad taste in the mouth on leaving the theater.

But that's just a tiny party of an otherwise great and grand film that is visually, one of the most remarkable films ever made. It doesn't have the geologic or biologic realism of an Avatar, but the fantasy characters - all out of proportion and scale with every other character, are brilliantly realized.

Perhaps my appreciation will fade after the glow of just viewing the movie has passed, but I do think that it will remain my favorite Burton film.
 
^^^^

Thank you so much for this great review. :) [Better than Sweeney Todd, Edward Scissorhands, and Batman though?]

I am off with my wife to see it in a couple hours. I will report back with my opinions later on.
 
I saw this movie so high on THC Soda. I hated it. Gave me an anxiety attack, freaked me out to a level I never new a movie could do. This ____ was crazy. Goddamn. It was like a dream I couldnt wake up from.

I'll give it a second chance, but I remember the movie not making any sense, and how utterly lame the Fuddwacker or whatever that dance was. Not to mention how scary it was to see someone's head spin that way....ew.

But I think this is one of Burton's worst.
 
^^^^

Thank you so much for this great review. :) [Better than Sweeney Todd, Edward Scissorhands, and Batman though?]

I am off with my wife to see it in a couple hours. I will report back with my opinions later on.

I guess you could say that it's rated by how many times I'd go "man, that's dumb." It happened a LOT in Scissorhands, only once in Todd and about 5 or 6 times in Batman. But I only thought it once (Fuddwhacker) in Alice.
 
Wow. Devin at CHUD has a perfect record of completely 100% disagreeing with me on every level.

I had no expectations for this film at all. The trailer promised another visual extravaganza from Burton but light on story and character like ALL his films, every single one. I figured it might be a mild distraction like Chocolate Factory - beautiful to look at but a failure on the narrative level. So I was not going in with any preconceived expectation of awesomeness of a diehard Burton fan. But I have to say that I think this is most likely my favorite film of his EVER.

I do have to admit that everything is better in digital 3D, and that does add a dimension (pun intended) to the movie going experience that isn't present with flat films. But the sights and sounds (great score by Elfman) of the film drew me in, and for the first time I was truly drawn in by a Burton character. Alice has a very defined character arc, simplistic as it may be, it's definitely there and infinitely relatable, not only for young women, but for everyone. She very much follows the traditional Campbell Hero's Journey, but there's nothing wrong with that. And Depp is heartbreaking, funny, brave and wacky in a character called inconsistent because he is actually, truly at least half-mad (crazy mad, as in mentally instable). And we get to see the event that unhinged him - again, it's a simplistic character beat, but Tarrant (the Hatter's true name), is someone we can identify with and sympathize with completely. Depp goes in and out of madness and in and out of a Scots accent, but you can see the work he's doing and the real thought that lies behind the characterization. His Highlander homage near the end is also a great moment.

In fact many of the characters have a depth that is far beyond a Disney "kid's" film or a Burton film. Glover's evil Knave of Hearts, Hathaway's White Queen - even the little Dormouse are distinct characters that we can hate or care about. Bonham-Carter's Red Queen is even a tad sympathetic, made human by her hidden frustration at not being lovable like her sister and settling for ruling by fear.

I think much of the bad reviews may be centered on expectations. The original story of Alice in Wonderland is full of childish whimsy, a story for small children that is designed to amuse and nothing more. This film is a sequel to the original Alice and Through the Looking Glass and where the older stories were for kids, this story is not really aimed at that audience. It is much, much darker and deals with more adult themes (adult as in complex, not as in sexual) and is about a young woman finding out that she may or may not have a destiny.

Not only is it very dark, it is an adventure story and not a comedy as some might be expecting. There are some funny moments, but this isn't a traditional children's film that may build up the tension to then cut it with a laugh. I definitely wouldn't recommend it for anyone under 10 and I think they'd need to be 13-14 to really appreciate it. However the 3 or 4 year old in row I was in, seemed entranced by it and didn't fidget or complain. He seemed completely engaged and asked occasional questions about the characters on screen.

There is one misstep and I think it's a colossal one - the Fudwacket(?) breakdance seems completely out of place and unnecessary, both from Tarrant and later it's echo with Alice. It takes one out of the film so completely, it could definitely leave a bad taste in the mouth on leaving the theater.

But that's just a tiny party of an otherwise great and grand film that is visually, one of the most remarkable films ever made. It doesn't have the geologic or biologic realism of an Avatar, but the fantasy characters - all out of proportion and scale with every other character, are brilliantly realized.

Perhaps my appreciation will fade after the glow of just viewing the movie has passed, but I do think that it will remain my favorite Burton film.



Okay, based on that, I will go see it. My neighbor just saw it, I said " I heard not so good" and he said he really liked it. And my neighbor is 75 but definitely not showing it.

So with those two combined, I'm seeing it tomorrow.
 
I keep having horrible flash backs to this movie. I hate pure THC....bad thoughts, bad thoughts! Even the score unnerves me.
 
I guess you could say that it's rated by how many times I'd go "man, that's dumb." It happened a LOT in Scissorhands, only once in Todd and about 5 or 6 times in Batman. But I only thought it once (Fuddwhacker) in Alice.

:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:

Wow, I just don't know what to say to that...


Clearly you don't get Burton. Each is entitled to his opinion... I for one have a big poster of Edward Scissorhands right over my monitor right now. ("The story of an uncommonly gentle man.") One of my favorite movies of all time.


Regarding Alice: I just got back from seeing it and I'm happy to say that it exceeded my expectations in most ways.

I was actually very pleased with the story. My favorite part of Through the Looking Glass was always "Jabberwocky" and I was not expecting...

So much of the plot to revolve around that poem!!!

I was mouthing along with parts of the movie because I used to have all of Jabberwocky memorized (and I still remember most of it):



'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.

"Beware the Jabberwock, my son!
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch!
Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun
The frumious Bandersnatch!"

He took his vorpal sword in hand:
Long time the manxome foe he sought—
So rested he by the Tumtum tree,
And stood awhile in thought.

And as in uffish thought he stood,
The Jabberwock, with eyes of flame,
Came whiffling through the tulgey wood,
And burbled as it came!

One, two! One, two! and through and through
The vorpal blade went snicker-snack!
He left it dead, and with its head
He went galumphing back.

"And hast thou slain the Jabberwock?
Come to my arms, my beamish boy!
O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!"
He chortled in his joy.

'Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
Did gyre and gimble in the wabe;
All mimsy were the borogoves,
And the mome raths outgrabe.
:rock


A very pleasant surprise!



I also liked that a favorite line from the book was featured so prominently in the movie
several times and even at the climax...

I have this hanging in my bathroom...
P1060610.jpg

...and now every morning I will be thinking
"I can slay the Jabberwock"!!!
:rock


Another nice surprise was that Crispin Glover was in the movie. I'm a big fan of his and somehow I didn't know he was going to be in it!





Now for the bad. :(

As Dave said, the Mad Hatters breakdance was way out of place. Even more so, the music during that scene is straight out of Elfman's Umpa Lumpa music from CATCF. This is a period piece and that brief moment of modern music really takes you out of the film. Thankfully it's a pretty short scene.

What bothered me more was the quality of the CGI. Perhaps I am spoiled by the amazing effects of AVATAR (it's the last movie I saw) and it's motion capture, but the way characters moved looked choppy in Alice. Stayne (Crispin Glover) in particular really stood out as not moving naturally. From the first time I saw his whole body, all I could think about when he was on screen was how unnatural he looked. This brings the score down for me quite a bit.


Right now I am giving the movie a 7 out of 10.



But if they make an Alice figure
wearing her knight's armor with the vorpal blade
I will buy it!!!
 
Last edited:
I keep having horrible flash backs to this movie. I hate pure THC....bad thoughts, bad thoughts! Even the score unnerves me.

Should've used that before watching Wolverine, then maybe you would've appreciated it more. :D
 
:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused:

Wow, I just don't know what to say to that...


Clearly you don't get Burton. Each is entitled to his opinion... I for one have a big poster of Edward Scissorhands right over my monitor right now. ("The story of an uncommonly gentle man.") One of my favorite movies of all time.

!

There really isn't anything to "get" with Burton. While I'm not a diehard Burton fanboy - I do appreciate his films - aside from Scissorhands, Ed Wood, PotA and Big Fish I've really enjoyed everything he's done. And don't get me wrong about Batman - I saw it 8 times in the theatre and absolutely love it, the same way I love the Donner Superman. But there are some really, really stupid things in that movie, just as there are in most Burton films. Perhaps my expectations for Alice were so exceedingly low because I recognize Burton's limitations as a gothic visual director - and he does that better than anyone working today rivaled perhaps only by Gilliam, but he doesn't even try to do much with character or story. That's kind of why I enjoyed Alice so much- I really saw that he had grown as a director with this film.
 
Aside from 3 of his best movies? Edward Sissorhands was really well done, as was Big Fish. And of course Ed Wood is his finest film to date. The best look, the best acting, everything was top notch there.
 
There really isn't anything to "get" with Burton.


Nothing to get? I don't mean that you are incapable of understanding his films. His stories aren't meant to be complex. They aren't intelectual thrillers or deep philosophical journeys.


You need to "get" them with your :redblob.


Not everyone is capable of this. Burton gives us inventive versions of arch-typical characters in a truly unique and gothic setting. His films reach your inner child and give a simple touching lesson on how to live (or how not to in the case of Sweeney Todd).

Johnny Depp has said that Edward Scissorhands was the character that he most strives to be in life (or something like that). Depp gets Burton.


And so do I.
 
Edward Sissorhands commercials terrified me as a child. Just though I'd share that.

More on topic, my cousin is a huge Burton fan and loved the movie.
 
I dispise most Tim Burton films. He's soo 1 dimensional. The only film I really like of his is Nightmare Before Christmas.
 
Stayne (Crispin Glover) in particular really stood out as not moving naturally. From the first time I saw his whole body, all I could think about when he was on screen was how unnatural he looked. This brings the score down for me quite a bit.

I thought that was done on purpose. I don't think he was supposed to move naturally.
 
Back
Top