Crap Star wars films but decent adventures in their own right. I also prefer TPM.
1. The fact that ROTS was better than ROTJ.
2. Each movie was a hell of a fun cultural event, regardless of whether or not the actual film lived up to it.
3. Great new John Williams music, Ben Burtt sound effects, and planet/spaceship designs.
4. Genuine badass moments from Darth Maul, Jango Fett, and even Anakin in ROTS.
5. The fact that after 1983 I thought I'd never again see new SW footage, so really everything good in the PT was just gravy.
1. The fact that ROTS was better than ROTJ.
I forgot a big one:
6. ROTJ is a much better movie after the PT (specifically ROTS.) There's now greater poignancy in Vader's decision to save Luke after his misstep when Mace Windu was being electrocuted. I also like that when Luke temporarily gains "the high ground" Vader throws his saber to bring him down instead of recklessly jumping up to meet him.
1. The fact that ROTS was better than ROTJ.
QUOTE]
I'm glad I'm not the only one to think this. If you're only comparing ROTS to ROTJ I think Sith is the much more cohesive and better story. Of course this doesn't make the PT the better trilogy, but I believe Sith tops Jedi everytime. There are so many more things wrong with Jedi...in my opinion.
Yep.
People complain about the PT turning previous badasses into pansies. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about the PT featuring bad acting except for Ian McDiarmid. ROTJ did it first.
People complaing about the PT having static "talking head" scenes in front of dodgy 2D backgrounds. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about the PT having "cute" characters made to sell toys. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about Lucas being surrounded by "yes" men who didn't challenge his story arcs. ROTJ did it first.
And so on. And the fact that ROTJ did all those things after being perfectly set up by ANH and TESB makes it much more unforgivable. I still prefer the OT, but movie to movie ROTS is absolutely the better film.
Yep.
People complain about the PT turning previous badasses into pansies. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about the PT featuring bad acting except for Ian McDiarmid. ROTJ did it first.
People complaing about the PT having static "talking head" scenes in front of dodgy 2D backgrounds. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about the PT having "cute" characters made to sell toys. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about Lucas being surrounded by "yes" men who didn't challenge his story arcs. ROTJ did it first.
And so on. And the fact that ROTJ did all those things after being perfectly set up by ANH and TESB makes it much more unforgivable. I still prefer the OT, but movie to movie ROTS is absolutely the better film.
Yep. All the more amazing that the PT made it an even better scene.
Yep.
People complain about the PT turning previous badasses into pansies. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about the PT featuring bad acting except for Ian McDiarmid. ROTJ did it first.
People complaing about the PT having static "talking head" scenes in front of dodgy 2D backgrounds. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about the PT having "cute" characters made to sell toys. ROTJ did it first.
People complain about Lucas being surrounded by "yes" men who didn't challenge his story arcs. ROTJ did it first.
And so on. And the fact that ROTJ did all those things after being perfectly set up by ANH and TESB makes it much more unforgivable. I still prefer the OT, but movie to movie ROTS is absolutely the better film.
Meanwhile I simply cannot agree that Sith is better than Jedi.
I am just curious as to what you were referring to as bad acting in ROTJ?
Enter your email address to join: