You have zero credibility after misreading those sandbox posts. You're misreading a lot of what's being said in this thread too.
Misreading is fine, so long as you back it up with an argument. But no, you're happy to throw the isms around as though the accusation alone obviates you from having to engage in any way that's constructive or meaningful. 8 posts in this thread and just about every one of them provocative and hostile.
Speak for yourself. I want a version of the Notebook where I can imagine the hottest chick on the planet building me a ****ing house.
I’m all for this as I’m hoping this is finally the push we need to get a man to play Wonder Woman.
I get where you’re coming from believe me but I think what they’re trying to point out is that males have been at the forefront of cinema for so many decades that your Leia, Marion Ravenwood, Sarah Connor, Ripley, Furiosa and the Bride stick out like sore thumbs instead of them just being one of the many strong female leads just like Indy is just one of the many thousands of male leads.
I think having a male WW would just be spiteful is what i’m saying.
Good post Jye. BUT, the difference between what Rambler said and, say, the author of the article JAWS posted, is that I'm quite certain Rambler doesn't seriously want a man playing Wonder Woman. He knows it would be a stupid idea. He's making the point that replacing James Bond in the James Bond franchise - if that's what they're intending to do - is also an inherently stupid idea.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/lasha...taking-over-as-james-bond-its-about-damn-time
.........
2. Why is it about Damn time?
I'm so used to seeing those words around here used sarcastically - it's Kara's running joke.
Well if they’re going to do it they’re going to do it with existing big brands like your Bond.
It’s news because it’s Bond.
They want it to make noise for marketing reasons.
Atomic Blonde is not a brand never was and never will be no one will care if a man takes on the role of Atomic Blonde lol
Bond is the perfect brand to mess with to get people talking.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, to 'start a conversation'. Trouble is these conversations are entirely useless when the only contribution from one side is moral grandstanding, throwing the 'ists' and the 'isms' at anyone who isn't wholly on board with the change and then putting their fingers in their ears.
So it's not a conversation at all. It's just baiting and provocation and I don't think it's helping anything. As said by
This is my point exactly. This stupid move does nothing for the positive shift in thinking that is happening in Hollywood finally in regards to diversity and inclusivity in terms of ethnicity, sex and body variety.
All it does is cause inane backlash. It seems cheap and unfortunate that the broccoli family would resort to a tactic like this after firmly and respectfully stating time again in respect to the source material Bond is to only be portrayed as a white male.
I will follow up and specify my thoughts are purely coming from the perspective that this woman will indeed take over the mantle. That’s is just blasphemous.
If she’s a plot device in this particular film before the franchise be rebooted with a Richard madden type than I’m all for it. I think it’s cool and not because it’s a black Woman as 007 but that someone else, black, white, man woman etc is 007 and not Bond and that makes for an interesting premise! and if she’s good casting for that particular role than that’s great, but it shouldn’t be simply because she is black and female either. This is what we call positive discrimination.
''Positive shift in thinking that is happening in Hollywood finally in regards to diversity and inclusivity''. Hah! Nice try man. We know you're a racist, sexist pig.
Last edited: