FrodoEyes
Super Freak
There are some screenshots and behind the scenes photos where it is smaller, so it seems there are different reference materials available.
Do you have any of the screenshots you are talking about? Multiple costumes seems plausible, but in the Fellowship we only see Sauron with the large “skirt”, which this statue is supposed to replicate.There are some screenshots and behind the scenes photos where it is smaller, so it seems there are different reference materials available.
Agreed. I think the painting techniques are much better on Weta's statue compared to Prime 1.Prime 1 armor looks too shiny to me but otherwise yes it's a more accurate piece. Weta doing the right color scheme this time tips the scale their way for me overall.
That's some nice investigating. Thanks for the info.Agreed. I think the painting techniques are much better on Weta's statue compared to Prime 1.
With regards to the "issue" with the Weta statue: I contacted the Workshop and they said multiple actors had to use the same set of Sauron's armour. In the Mount Doom scene, a shorter actor was used which caused gaps in the armor. To fill these, they enlarged the mailed "skirt", giving a different impression. The one Weta has done, this time and 20 years ago, is said to be the correct set of armour they did for the movie. I guess it is the one we see in other shots, but because we only see the lower body in one scene, it is impossible to compare the settings and differences.
Yes, they did. But they also made Sauron at Mount Doom, which is the only time we see Sauron's whole body. Which means that the large mail "skirt" we see in that shot is how Sauron is supposed to look in a "Fellowship" setting.Didn't WETA design the character in the first place?
I'd think they're the keepers of how the character is supposed to look.
Enter your email address to join: