As evidenced by my list above (which, per the thread parameters, doesn't include MCU or Star Wars) Hot Toys still has a ways to go with the licenses they already have. I also forgot to include Indiana Jones, TRON and updated Rocky.
However, if we're talking about new licenses, I'd add:
- The Fifth Element
- Blade Runner
- Big Trouble in Little China
- Coming to America
- Tombstone
- Interview with the Vampire
- The Abyss
- Classic Universal Monsters
- Comic accurate Marvel
- Comic accurate DC
Given HT's long production cycle, ever increasing prices, incomplete lines, and heavy focus on main sellers, I'd actually prefer to see two or three other companies pick up those licenses. I've been quite satisfied with a number of figures from producers like Blitzway, Asmus and ThreeZero, as well as unlicensed producers like Toys Era and SooSoo. Most are still a slot or two below Hot Toys, but they're also $50- $100 cheaper and don't take 2-3 years from solicitation to in hand.
I think Hot Toys hangs on to licenses like Terminator, Aliens, Predator, Rocky, Matrix, Indiana Jones, Tron and others to keep other competitors out of the market. Carrying those licenses must cost them something every year, and clearly there's no requirement to produce a minimum number of figures. Which is weird because often times licensors will ask for a certain dollar amount plus a percentage of sales. For example let's say the Terminator license is $100,000/year plus 10% of sales after the first 1,000 units (round numbers for the sake of argument). So if Hot Toys sells say 5,000 Terminator T-800 chrome diecast endos @ $400/each, the licensor makes $260,000 ($100K fee + $160K sales).
Of course there are all types of contracts. Hot Toys might have signed a multi-year contract up front, fulfilled the minimum requirements after a few figures, and just continues sitting on the licenses. Or if these are renewable licenses (annually or every 3, 5 years) maybe licensors give them the option between fee+sales or flat fee, and HT just opts for the latter. Even if that is the case, I don't know why they don't subcontract those licenses out to smaller companies to generate revenue, keep licensors happy, and keep their collectors happy. I'm sure Hot Toys could easily structure a low risk/high reward subcontracting deal with a couple of small, hungry producers. I suppose they either believe it would cannibalize sales from the other lines or they don't want to clog up the manufacturing supply chain.