Voorhees27
Super Freak
"Maybe you should try watching a film that doesn't come with happy meal toys before you start to question another's knowledge of cinema."
Use your OWN advice.
That was some funny ass ^^^^.................
"Maybe you should try watching a film that doesn't come with happy meal toys before you start to question another's knowledge of cinema."
Use your OWN advice.
Yeah...im trying not to attack anyone for their opinions...but....man...this is hard. Already had some seeping through...
Indeed, i see those kind of shots in every Bruckheimer and Michael Mann movie. Unartistic shots indeed, thanks for the example.
Has watching TDK killed so many braincells that it caused blindspots in your reading?
How so?
If you don't mind me asking, what to you is the very BEST film ever made?
That was some funny ass ^^^^.................
Is it possible to like Both Nolan and Burton? They are too different interpretations.
.... but if you say you prefer Schumacher's... then you definitely have no sense in cinema. lol
Bruckheimer sucks satan's balls.=Voorhees27;1078516]So Bruckheimer and Mann suck?
If you don't mind me asking, what to you is the very BEST film ever made?
Yes, yes and yes.
I love Burton's stuff, and I love Nolan's stuff.
Bruckheimer sucks satan's balls.
Mann is ok but not All that, his characterizations are immature.
No such thing, many great films have been made.
^^^^ the comics, Burton doesn't give a ^^^^ about comics.
Has watching TDK killed so many braincells that it caused blindspots in your reading?
Sorry dude thats weak, EVERYTHING comes down to just one...................
Alien/Aliens is my number one movie(s) of all time. I cant pick one. It shifts every day.
and that is why Burton versions were lacking. Batman in all of his incarnations is a comic book character. If you make a comic book based movie but choose to ignore 70 years of the character, to create "your version" why bother calling it a Batman film. That's like taking Lord of the Rings for instance, making a movie and deciding "the whole part with the ring is redundant lets take it out". I have yet to see a accurate portrayal of the Batman character and his world, but Nolan's version is definately the closest so far.
Non-sense, not concerning art. Some poeple like Van Gogh better than Rembrandt, ewho is right here? Some people prefer Beethoven over Mozart, who is right here?
Personally i think Burton's looks and feel much closer to the batman in the comics although i have to admitt i only read a few.
Enter your email address to join: