- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
You don't speak for me.
I would buy one! There is a market for this sort of thing.
Not one big enough to go through all the trouble and money to make it...
You don't speak for me.
I would buy one! There is a market for this sort of thing.
i don't think half the people posting here have any sense of scale.Not one big enough to go through all the trouble and money to make it...
i don't think half the people posting here have any sense of scale.
you can show them all the pics you want and they still think a 1:6 jockey is a $100 toy they can put on a shelf.
I'd want a 1:6 scale queen and jockey. But for those who have issues with scale, they can be 1:6-ish, don't have to be exact 1:6 scale, but close.
Sean
yeah, posting pics hasn't convinced anyone so far.It's still too big even if it's not quite 1.6 I say:
that would be cool. it's pretty much to scale with 4" star wars figures.Maybe 1:18?
It's still too big even if it's not quite 1.6 I say:
collectible manufacturers' profit margins, the average square footage of houses, common sense, and physics all have issues with the scale of those figures.
what does that have to do with anything? was the movie about little kids?not sure if any on you know, but in that scene ridley scott had children dress in those suit so the space jockey would look giant.
ok, but the space jockey is still 3X the size of any tank and even half of it is enormous.Yeah, but maybe like how 21st Century or Hasbro made their "1/6" vehicles slightly under-scale, the same could apply here. It's already been done by large manufacturers and there is big demand still for large tanks, etc (at least in the numbers we're talking). A jockey could be done in smaller scale or even only half the sculpture (so one side is flat and fits on a shelf easily) but would likely be done by a customizer rather than the bigger company, like Hot Toys. But I would like a 1/6-ish queen by Hot Toys or someone.
Sean
what does that have to do with anything? was the movie about little kids?
when the actors were in those suits they were closer to 7ft tall. that's what the scene is representing.
ok, but the space jockey is still 3X the size of any tank and even half of it is enormous.
there's already a topic devoted to how stupid it would be if HT made a 1:6 queen, so i won't get into it here.
and there clearly isn't any point in trying to correct you people. so i'm out. keep hope alive.
I'm pretty sure this will be made, Ridley Scott does plan to film a prequel explaining the origins of the space Jockey.