Will Schwartzenneger return to films?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
If there is a God...niether Arnold nor Sylvester will ever desecrate the silver screen with their (non)acting again. It has always been a source of wonder for me that anyone with such non-existant acting abilities can make so much at the box office.

It really lends to my loss of faith in people.

If you could accomplish 1/10 of what Stallone did JUST writing i'd give you my entire collection. But you did mention acting and Arnie can't act but I have to dissagree Sly is fine. He's made some cheesy ass movies but has made some definete classics!

First Blood
Rocky
 
If there is a God...niether Arnold nor Sylvester will ever desecrate the silver screen with their (non)acting again. It has always been a source of wonder for me that anyone with such non-existant acting abilities can make so much at the box office.

It really lends to my loss of faith in people.

You are forgetting that their prime was in the 80`s,action heroes was cool,as long as you had the body and kicking ass fans didnt care how good or bad actor they were,time change mate,dont forget that.

Arnie is a story of his own,he is just bad at everything,but a good laugh,and for that,i love his movies:lol

People most are referring to Rocky when they talk about Sly`s mumbling,watch his other movies besides Rocky and Rambo and THEN tell me if he is just as bad as he used to be early in his career.
 
If there is a God...niether Arnold nor Sylvester will ever desecrate the silver screen with their (non)acting again. It has always been a source of wonder for me that anyone with such non-existant acting abilities can make so much at the box office.

It really lends to my loss of faith in people.

The Terminator 1 and 2
Total recall
predator
commando
kindergarten cop
twins
Rocky 1,2,3,4 Rocky Balboa
Rambo 1,2,4
cliffhanger
copland
All these movies :rock
 
If there is a God...niether Arnold nor Sylvester will ever desecrate the silver screen with their (non)acting again. It has always been a source of wonder for me that anyone with such non-existant acting abilities can make so much at the box office.

It really lends to my loss of faith in people.

They are not actors, they are movie stars. People that are paid to entertain us.

And Stallone has a Best Actor Oscar nomination and can act.
 
Yup, Stallone is a good actor and writer/director. Notice I don't say great, but Stallone if given the proper role can act very well. Plus, he's a smart guy and a hell of a marketer.

As for Arnold, hey, he's Arnold and some of my favorite movies star him. As for what I want to see is for him to hit the gym strong(he can do this, he's frickin Arnold) and I WANT KING CONAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Please. Get Milius back and Arnold and we have gold!
 
Do I need Arnold to come back now? No. But it would be cool to have "action movie stars" again like there were in the '80s. I can't think of anyone making movies today that have the same "action hero" charisma and screen presence like he and Stallone had. There are pale imitations like The Rock and Vin Diesel, but that's all they are. Imitations.
 
I am well aware of what movies they made and how far they went. And how much money they made. And as far as my matching it...not only am I happy with my chosen profession and measely 6 digit salary, but I FIRMLY believe that I could act better just the same. In fact, I was in a play when I attended Saratoga Elementary School in Lincoln, Nebraska, where I played a bicuspid. I think I was around 7. And my big part was singing a song call "Lactobacilliacidopholi" and I would put my rendition of that part up against ANY supposed acting that either of these single-digit cranial microbes have done. And the fact that Arnold has attained a Governorship does not lend evidence to his brilliance in my opinion, it lends evidence to voters folly. Jesse Ventura was successful at doing the same thing. And even though he is a lousy actor as well...he is still better than these two.

And in my opinion, there was no substance in any of their (in my opinion) feeble acting. And nobody will ever convince me that what they did in those movies was anything akin to art. I like action too. And I like the Predator movies...for the Predators. Kindergarten Cop and Twins were entertaining, but if that is the best either of them can brag...then my point is made for me.

And Sylvester Stallone gets the added thumbs down from me for presuming to represent Viet Nam vets in his movies after dodging the draft and running to Canada to make porno movies (which, coincidently, is a MUCH better genre for his abilities).
 
You know what dude you are absolutely right, they ACCIDENTALLY became successfull and ACCIDENTALLY (Sly specifically) lasted the test of time in an industry that has animals for critics. :rolleyes:

People loved to watch their movies because they were to dumb to know better, I mean, where were you when we needed your insight? :D
 
Sly takes HGH THAT'S why he's still in shape:

According to ninemsn.com and other sources, when interviewing officers asked Stallone why he took Jintropin, he said:




In the February 4, 2008 edition of Time, Stallone was interviewed about his use of HGH, which he defended:




Plus when Sly was younger he wasn't a Body Builder and as huge as Arnold. The Governator also admitted to taking roids before too. The majority of guys who are super buff when they get older get flabby. All that muscle turns into fat. It's normal.

That is myth that muscle turns to fat.
You get fat by eating more calories then you are burning off.

When people stop exercising and shift into couch potato mode, their muscles begin to shrink, clearing the way for adipose tissue, or fat, to slowly replace them. At the same time, many people who stop exercising often continue to consume the same amount of calories as they took in during their more active days, despite the fact that their energy expenditure is no longer nearly what it once was.

All of this can create the illusion that a lean six-pack and bulging set of biceps turned to fat, What happens is that the ratio of fat to muscle has changed

If you have atrophy of the muscle, then other tissue can move in and take its place.

But even people who refuse to hit the gym can avoid this fate. Despite what some personal trainers may say, most people in decent shape can keep their muscles from shrinking through moderate activities or chores, like cleaning the house or walking the dog

THE BOTTOM LINE Muscles might shrink when you stop working out, but they never turn to fat.

schwarzenegger.jpg


The reason why Arnold is not in shape is from using massive amounts of roids (not as large as today's bodybuilders)

Steroids are a short term fix and only work while you are on them, when you go off them your muscles shrink quicker then natural

But if you are a nature bodybuilder you can maintain muscle mass for the rest of your life by working out or even light physical activity.

Many old time pre-steroid bodybuilders have maintained their size all through the later years

Look at Steve Reeves..

By his own account, his best cold (unpumped) measurements at the peak of his bodybuilding activity were:

Height: 6 ft 1 in (1.85 m)
Weight: 216
Neck: 18 1/4"
Chest: 52"
Waist: 29"
Biceps: 18 1/4"
Thighs: 26"
Calves: 18 1/4"

Steve was a successful cattle rancher...who happened to do bodybuilding as a hobby and acting in films in order to travel and make a living. He wrote letters and articles about his natural status including one to Arnold (that was published) about the sport and his views and experience. His weight at age 74 was the same as it was in '47...and was pretty much the same all through his life for the most part.
He weighed himself every day and wrote it on a calendar. In pictures, he looked half the size of the guys of the 1970s and 1/4 of the size of the guys today. Maybe that's not extraordinary or impressive, but in person, standing next to him, he looked bigger than many Olympic competitors because his frame, height and overall shape and size was quite large and would have been so even if he had not trained with weights. His father Lester was a big man and extremely strong as well and of similiar build, height and weight. The older people in Glasgow, Montana still talk about how strong Lester Reeves was who was born in 1899. Steve's grandfather Sylvester was huge too and even taller than Steve.

he maintained muscle by working out or farm work

sr37.jpg



2408837837_f906a87889.jpg

sreev001.jpg


steve-reeves-bodybuilding-culturismo.jpg

Reeves in his 20's

Friends10.jpg

Reeves in his 70s

https://www.stevereevesbiography.com/

https://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/reeves.html

https://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=203169.0


Considering the salary he was getting he was a "A" actor. No director/producer would pay a "B" level actor $250,000.

Unfortunately most of his movies were "sword and sandals" and the leading men at the time (Hudson, Cooper) probably refused to work with him because his physique next to theirs would take away attention from them. The Euro movies paid more and thats where he went. Those S&S movies were popular during that era. like Arnold, Reeves was more of an action hero type rather than a marlon brando/Gary cooper type.


Hollywood is a combination of art and money. Reeves was definitely the latter part.


He was asked to star as James Bond in Dr. No, which he turned down. He also declined the role that finally went to Clint Eastwood in A Fistful of Dollars.

He chose to stick with the "action figure" roles because it was popular at the time and he didnt go for dramatic roles. Nhe went where the money was. Greek heroes tarzan movies and spaggeti westerns were a rage back then. Steve gambled on S&S roles which had its time and then the audience moved on. If clint eastwood had stuck only to westerns and not done dirty harry and the like he would be classified as "B" level actor as well.
 
Last edited:
If there is a God...niether Arnold nor Sylvester will ever desecrate the silver screen with their (non)acting again. It has always been a source of wonder for me that anyone with such non-existant acting abilities can make so much at the box office.

It really lends to my loss of faith in people.


Understandable, I suppose. But I would point out to you that guys like DeNiro, Paccino and Nicholson have WON OSCARS for turning in the exact same two-dimensional repeat performances their whole careers. Highly over-rated. Why are they geniuses for doing it, and Schwarzenegger and Stallone are idiots?? I'll never get that. Ever.

Personally those three guys lend to MY loss of faith in people. At least with Stallone and Arnie, peopletend to take them with a grain of salt and enjoy those movies for what they are. But they don't worship and pray to those movies, like with the other guys. I just don't get it. I would watch The Terminator 1,000 times before I would watch even HALF of Scarface even once!
 
His face may be right for the long in development "Doc Savage"
Arnold is an expert at getting into shape quickly and if not a torso prosthetic would do it.
Remember Tim Curry in Legend?
Of course you do.:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top