First off my comment was speculative, I never said I have 100% proof, but my comments were based on what I've seen of SS over the years and were my opinion... Where as you said I was 100% wrong even though you have zero proof other then SSAlex (who is a nice person) but just repeats what marketing tells her to say. At least that's the impression I've gotten from her comments over the years...
As for your comment that there is no reason why SS wouldn't state it if they quit the run on a statue, I disagree there is a downside to it, that their statue was a failure and SS screwed the pooch on the design. That's something SS seems to try and avoid... It's one of the reasons why Igo said that the forums only make up 3% of their customer base, it's to delegitimized any bad reviews of their statues, there basically saying sure 3% don't like it but 97% of our customers love it.
When SS LIED about the artist signing their artwork (at least technically, since it was a machine signing it) and got caught they lost creditability, for me at least, along with the "I checked all our statues and there are none better looking then what you sent pictures of but hey here's $15 if you keep it", like a guy is going to check hundreds of boxes and get back to you a few hours later.... so yeah I take anything they say with a grain of salt.
BTW, if SS makes less then what they state, how is there legal consequences? Like someone is only buying a statue because they know there will be min. of X amount, now if they make more then what they state then that's a different story...
If you want to believe everything SS says, more power to ya.... And to make it clear for you "THIS IS JUST MY OPINION"
Honestly, that just makes your post 100 times worse as basically what you were doing was running around calling someone (me) naive based on pure speculation with no proof whatsoever. My advice, if your going to call someone out and call them naive, you better have more than just your own opinion to back it up. Otherwise that just makes you look argumentative and it also makes you look like someone that runs around thinking their opinions are fact even tho they have no proof to back them up and that is the LAST thing the internet needs more of. There are already WAY too many people running around pretending they know what they are talking about when they clearly don't. I have the word of one of the main people at Sideshow in charge of dealing with the pubic and answering questions from the public, which is a WHOLE LOT more than just pure speculation. In all my years of collecting statues and being on StatueForum, which is a LONG time, I have yet to see SSAlex lie or make a single claim that was inaccurate.
And just based on pure common sense, one should come to the realization that Sideshow would have absolutely NO reason not to come out and tell people that a statue's edition was stopped early and update the edition size publicly for that statue as they would only cease production of a statue if a statue wasn't selling well and telling people that a particular statue has a smaller edition size than they originally thought would only make the people that purchased the statue that much more happy as a smaller edition size is a good thing for collectors. And since Sideshow did come out and publicly update the edition size on the one statue that did have its production stopped early, there is absolutely no reason to think they wouldn't continue to do the same thing with other statues that had their editions cut short. And given the sell out rates that Sideshow has been seeing since increasing their edition sizes significantly, there would be no reason why Sideshow would even have to contemplate ceasing a production run early. So again, just based on pure common sense, one should have come to the realization that Sideshow would have no need to cut production runs early and if they did they would have come out and stated as such and publicly updated the edition size of that statue so it remained accurate. The fact that SSAlex confirmed as much...well, that should put this entire issue to bed in very short order, unless someone has proof that suggests otherwise and until I see proof that suggests otherwise, I have absolutely no reason to believe that SSAlex is lying or that his information is inaccurate.
And SS didn't lie about their prints not having real signatures. The description of the prints just wasn't clear in this regard, which people found a bit deceptive, but once the topic came under scrutiny, Sideshow came right out and admitted that they were machine signatures and updated the way they described that aspect of the prints on their website. I was as pissed off as anyone as I had already ordered 15 prints from them and I would have never purchased any of them if I had known they had fake signatures, but there is a big difference between not accurately describing something and blatantly lying. And Sideshow offered people a full refund on the prints they had already purchased, which is exactly what I did. I returned all of my prints and got a 100% refund on all of them. Again once this topic came under scrutiny, Sideshow came right out and admitted as much. That is very different from Sideshow outright lying like Aspen did for 10 years regarding their open edition Marvel/DC prints being sold as limited editions. It took me roughy 16 months of emailing Aspen time and time and time again before Frank Mastromauro came out and admitted that the Marvel/DC prints were in fact open editions.
As for the possible legal consequences, and its important to note that I said POSSIBLE legal consequences, all of the laws that have been made in recent years regarding limited edition collectibles come right out and say that the collector has a right to know EXACTLY how many are made and that the company has to make that information available. I don't know if there have been any laws passed relating specifically to limited edition statues, but that might not really matter as one can use the other limited edition laws as precedence. So if it came to light that Sideshow was in fact ceasing statue runs early thus making the stated edition size inaccurate, one could possibly take Sideshow to court over the matter. Its all about transparency and collectors knowing exactly how many of a particular limited edition exist. It doesn't matter if the actions of Sideshow didn't negatively effect the value of the statues. Again, its simply about transparency with limited editions and collectors having a right to know EXACTLY how many of a particular limited edition exist. So there are unquestionably possible legal consequences if a company producing limited edition's state inaccurate figures for their limited editions.
I have proof. Obi was listed as sold out. It wasn't. I don't need more proof, but you keep drinking that Kool Aid...you obviously like the taste.
You clearly didn't read my post so there is really no sense even going on with you. Why bother having a discussion with people if they can't take the time to properly read posts? As my post CLEARLY stated in the SSAlex quotes that I listed, Sideshow DID list Obi Wan as sold out as they had to cease production of the run due to factory capacity issues. Once the factory was able to continue the production of the run, Sideshow did just that and finished producing the entire edition, which is the basis of this entire debate, that Sideshow completes their editions and Obi Wan had its complete edition produced. It took a bit longer than Sideshow initially anticipated, but they still wound up finishing the complete edition.
And yes, I will continue to believe representatives of a company, especially one as well respected as SSAlex from Sideshow, over misc internet users that have absolutely ZERO proof to back up thier claims. That's not drinking the Kool-Aid. That's just pure common sense. One of the single worst aspects of the internet is the sheer number of people running around thinking thier opinions are fact even tho the have absolutely zero proof or zero data to back up those opinions. I won't even visit movie forums any more due to the sheer number of people running around thinking thier subjective opinions are fact. People that don't understand the basic concept of subjectivity shouldn't even be allowed to post on message boards.